GXIG vs. PAVE
GXIG (Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXIG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. GXIG is actively managed, while PAVE is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
GXIG vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXIG achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.88% return.
GXIG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
GXIG vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXIG Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.52% | 4.43% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 14.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXIG and PAVE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXIG vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
GXIG
PAVE
GXIG vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GXIG) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXIG | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.68 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
GXIG vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXIG drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXIG and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXIG | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -44.08% | +40.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -1.82% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -6.24% | +5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.24% | — |
Volatility
GXIG vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXIG | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.78% | 18.84% | -13.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 21.60% | -15.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 24.38% | -18.60% |
GXIG vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXIG vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
GXIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXIG Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXIG and PAVE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.
GXIG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 0.77% for PAVE.
GXIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GXIG and 0.47% for PAVE.
Find the right allocation for GXIG and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer