GXDW vs. BNO
GXDW (Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - GXDW is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXDW returned -12.06%/yr vs 20.16%/yr for BNO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXDW charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.
Performance
GXDW vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXDW achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 66.98% return.
GXDW
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -11.94%
- 6M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- -4.05%
- 3Y*
- -4.23%
- 5Y*
- -12.06%
- 10Y*
- —
BNO
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 55.35%
- YTD
- 66.98%
- 1Y
- 55.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 20.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
GXDW vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | 1.70% | 3.52% | -3.55% | 10.26% | -48.08% | 3.21% | 61.07% | 4.74% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 66.98% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 62.34% | -38.23% | 10.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXDW and BNO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.12 |
The correlation between GXDW and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXDW vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
GXDW
BNO
GXDW vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXDW | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.24 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.63 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 4.78 | -5.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXDW vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXDW drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXDW and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXDW | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -87.06% | +19.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.65% | -34.46% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.97% | -34.46% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.17% | -34.46% | -26.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.80% | -21.35% | -38.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.27% | -40.06% | -3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.33% | 11.71% | -0.38% |
Volatility
GXDW vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) is 10.60%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.79%. This indicates that GXDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXDW | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.60% | 15.79% | -5.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.42% | 39.17% | -15.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.44% | 42.76% | -13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.39% | 36.11% | -7.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.92% | 36.78% | -6.86% |
GXDW vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXDW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXDW vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
GXDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | 1.47% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXDW and BNO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (15.79%) compared to GXDW (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXDW dropped -67.81% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 5-year performance, BNO leads with 20.16% vs -12.06% for GXDW. On fees, GXDW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GXDW has been the lower-risk option at 10.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BNO has performed better with a 20.16% return vs -12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GXDW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.
GXDW has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
GXDW is categorized as Systematic Trend, while BNO is Oil & Gas. GXDW tracks Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: Global X and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXDW and 1.00% for BNO.
BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXDW and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer