PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXC vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXC vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a -3.93% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GXC has underperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 5.25%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.59% annualized return.


GXC

1D
-2.27%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-3.93%
6M
-5.13%
1Y
12.26%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
-4.55%
10Y*
5.25%

SPYD

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.57%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.97%
1Y
16.38%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXC vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
-3.93%30.84%14.60%-9.93%-22.12%-19.70%28.31%23.07%-19.39%51.66%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
10.34%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between GXC and SPYD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2015

0.37

The correlation between GXC and SPYD shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GXC vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GXC
SPYD

Consumer Cyclical

22.9%
6.5%

Financial Services

17.1%
12.1%

Communication Services

14.3%
5.1%

Technology

11.9%
2.7%

Industrials

9.1%
2.3%

Basic Materials

7.0%
3.4%

Healthcare

6.7%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
16.3%

Energy

3.5%
9.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
25.8%

Utilities

1.8%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GXC
22.9%
SPYD
6.5%

Financial Services

GXC
17.1%
SPYD
12.1%

Communication Services

GXC
14.3%
SPYD
5.1%

Technology

GXC
11.9%
SPYD
2.7%

Industrials

GXC
9.1%
SPYD
2.3%

Basic Materials

GXC
7.0%
SPYD
3.4%

Healthcare

GXC
6.7%
SPYD
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

GXC
3.7%
SPYD
16.3%

Energy

GXC
3.5%
SPYD
9.2%

Real Estate

GXC
1.9%
SPYD
25.8%

Utilities

GXC
1.8%
SPYD
11.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXC vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXC
GXC Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXC Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXC Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXC vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXCSPYDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

1.42

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

2.15

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.33

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.02

6.77

-4.76

GXC vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXC Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXC and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXCSPYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.42

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.42

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.44

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.47

-0.31

Drawdowns

GXC vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than SPYD's maximum drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXCSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.96%

-46.42%

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-7.05%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.54%

-16.13%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.99%

-22.25%

-31.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.23%

-46.42%

-13.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.10%

-1.11%

-30.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.82%

-6.17%

-22.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.09%

2.43%

+3.66%

Volatility

GXC vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 2.57%. This indicates that GXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXCSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

2.57%

+4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.59%

7.71%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.88%

11.62%

+7.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.97%

16.13%

+12.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.09%

19.78%

+6.31%

GXC vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXC vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than SPYD's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
2.50%2.40%2.81%3.70%2.67%1.35%1.04%1.60%2.03%1.84%2.05%2.85%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.21%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXC and SPYD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GXC has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to SPYD (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXC dropped -71.96% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 10-year performance, SPYD leads with 8.59% vs 5.25% for GXC. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYD has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GXC.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.50% for GXC.

GXC is categorized as China Equities, while SPYD is S&P 500. GXC tracks S&P China BMI Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GXC and 0.07% for SPYD.

SPYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXC and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer