GXC vs. SPYD
GXC (SPDR S&P China ETF) and SPYD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXC is a China Equities fund tracking the S&P China BMI Index, while SPYD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GXC returned 5.25%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for SPYD. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPYD.
Performance
GXC vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a -3.93% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GXC has underperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 5.25%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.59% annualized return.
GXC
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -3.93%
- 6M
- -5.13%
- 1Y
- 12.26%
- 3Y*
- 10.65%
- 5Y*
- -4.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
SPYD
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 16.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
GXC vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | -3.93% | 30.84% | 14.60% | -9.93% | -22.12% | -19.70% | 28.31% | 23.07% | -19.39% | 51.66% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 10.34% | 4.65% | 15.34% | 3.91% | -1.17% | 32.73% | -11.64% | 21.20% | -4.89% | 12.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXC and SPYD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2015 | 0.37 |
The correlation between GXC and SPYD shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GXC vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXC
SPYD
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
GXC
SPYD
Financial Services
GXC
SPYD
Communication Services
GXC
SPYD
Technology
GXC
SPYD
Industrials
GXC
SPYD
Basic Materials
GXC
SPYD
Healthcare
GXC
SPYD
Consumer Defensive
GXC
SPYD
Energy
GXC
SPYD
Real Estate
GXC
SPYD
Utilities
GXC
SPYD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXC vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank
GXC
SPYD
GXC vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXC | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.42 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 2.15 | -1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 2.33 | -1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 6.77 | -4.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXC | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.42 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.42 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.44 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.47 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
GXC vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than SPYD's maximum drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and SPYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXC | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.96% | -46.42% | -25.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -7.05% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.54% | -16.13% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.99% | -22.25% | -31.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.23% | -46.42% | -13.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.10% | -1.11% | -30.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -6.17% | -22.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 2.43% | +3.66% |
Volatility
GXC vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 2.57%. This indicates that GXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXC | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 2.57% | +4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.59% | 7.71% | +5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 11.62% | +7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.97% | 16.13% | +12.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 19.78% | +6.31% |
GXC vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXC vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison
GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than SPYD's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | 2.50% | 2.40% | 2.81% | 3.70% | 2.67% | 1.35% | 1.04% | 1.60% | 2.03% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 2.85% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 4.21% | 4.52% | 4.31% | 4.66% | 5.01% | 3.68% | 4.95% | 4.42% | 4.75% | 4.63% | 4.34% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXC and SPYD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GXC has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to SPYD (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXC dropped -71.96% vs SPYD's -46.42%.
On 10-year performance, SPYD leads with 8.59% vs 5.25% for GXC. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYD has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GXC.
SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.50% for GXC.
GXC is categorized as China Equities, while SPYD is S&P 500. GXC tracks S&P China BMI Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GXC and 0.07% for SPYD.
SPYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXC and SPYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer