GXC vs. EEMA
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA).
GXC and EEMA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GXC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P China BMI Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. EEMA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index. It was launched on Feb 8, 2012. Both GXC and EEMA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GXC or EEMA.
Correlation
The correlation between GXC and EEMA is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GXC vs. EEMA - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
GXC:
0.52
EEMA:
0.40
GXC:
1.02
EEMA:
0.75
GXC:
1.14
EEMA:
1.10
GXC:
0.35
EEMA:
0.30
GXC:
1.33
EEMA:
1.21
GXC:
14.18%
EEMA:
7.49%
GXC:
33.82%
EEMA:
21.96%
GXC:
-72.16%
EEMA:
-44.18%
GXC:
-40.27%
EEMA:
-17.74%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly higher than EEMA's 5.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GXC has underperformed EEMA with an annualized return of 1.01%, while EEMA has yielded a comparatively higher 3.66% annualized return.
GXC
10.54%
10.08%
6.45%
16.90%
-0.81%
1.01%
EEMA
5.69%
11.52%
0.61%
8.50%
6.08%
3.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GXC vs. EEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GXC vs. EEMA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GXC
EEMA
GXC vs. EEMA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
GXC vs. EEMA - Dividend Comparison
GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than EEMA's 1.65% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | 2.54% | 2.80% | 3.70% | 2.67% | 1.35% | 1.04% | 1.60% | 2.03% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 2.85% | 2.11% |
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 1.65% | 1.74% | 2.25% | 1.78% | 2.19% | 1.15% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 1.74% | 1.74% | 2.44% | 1.33% |
Drawdowns
GXC vs. EEMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -72.16%, which is greater than EEMA's maximum drawdown of -44.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and EEMA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
GXC vs. EEMA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) have volatilities of 6.77% and 6.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...