GXC vs. CAS
GXC (SPDR S&P China ETF) and CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) are both China Equities funds. GXC is passively managed, while CAS is actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for CAS.
Performance
GXC vs. CAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GXC
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- -6.50%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- -4.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.28%
CAS
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXC vs. CAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | -2.68% |
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -5.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXC and CAS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXC vs. CAS — Risk / Return Rank
GXC
CAS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GXC vs. CAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXC | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXC vs. CAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than CAS's maximum drawdown of -5.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and CAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXC | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.96% | -5.11% | -66.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.92% | -5.11% | -28.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.83% | -3.16% | -25.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.77% | — | — |
Volatility
GXC vs. CAS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXC | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.01% | 13.51% | +5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.00% | 13.51% | +15.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 13.51% | +12.58% |
GXC vs. CAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CAS's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXC vs. CAS - Dividend Comparison
GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, while CAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | 3.33% | 2.40% | 2.81% | 3.70% | 2.67% | 1.35% | 1.04% | 1.60% | 2.03% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXC and CAS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
GXC has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 0.00% for CAS.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GXC and 0.88% for CAS.
Find the right allocation for GXC and CAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer