GWW vs. PLTR
GWW (W.W. Grainger, Inc.) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) are both stocks. GWW operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while PLTR operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, GWW returned 24.71%/yr vs 39.00%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GWW vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWW achieves a 30.92% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.
GWW
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 30.92%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.36%
- 5Y*
- 24.71%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -27.99%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -5.33%
- 3Y*
- 99.99%
- 5Y*
- 39.00%
- 10Y*
- —
GWW vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 30.92% | -3.41% | 28.21% | 50.53% | 8.75% | 28.80% | 16.45% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -27.99% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWW and PLTR is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.18 |
The correlation between GWW and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GWW:
$62.37B
PLTR:
$329.05B
GWW:
$37.26
PLTR:
$0.89
GWW:
35.32
PLTR:
144.03
GWW:
2.04
PLTR:
0.84
GWW:
3.42
PLTR:
62.90
GWW:
15.87
PLTR:
38.94
GWW:
$18.38B
PLTR:
$5.22B
GWW:
$7.20B
PLTR:
$4.39B
GWW:
$2.82B
PLTR:
$2.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWW vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
GWW
PLTR
GWW vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GWW | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.03 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | -0.14 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | -0.25 | +3.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GWW vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWW drawdown since its inception was -56.73%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWW and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWW | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.73% | -84.62% | +27.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -38.22% | +24.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.50% | -40.61% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.50% | -79.14% | +54.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -38.22% | +37.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.01% | -40.27% | +29.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 21.23% | -13.62% |
Volatility
GWW vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is 4.85%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that GWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWW | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 17.16% | -12.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 38.32% | -20.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.78% | 50.83% | -26.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 65.44% | -40.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.52% | 69.75% | -41.23% |
Dividends
GWW vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
GWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 0.70% | 0.88% | 0.76% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 2.27% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GWW vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GWW vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison
GWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
PLTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
GWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
PLTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.
GWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
PLTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GWW and PLTR have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to GWW (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWW dropped -56.73% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GWW and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer