PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWW vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GWW vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWW achieves a 29.79% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's -2.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GWW having a 21.17% annualized return and JPM not far behind at 20.32%.


GWW

1D
0.35%
1M
5.96%
YTD
29.79%
6M
36.56%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
24.53%
10Y*
21.17%

JPM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.98%
YTD
-2.52%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
16.72%
10Y*
20.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWW vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
29.79%-3.41%28.21%50.53%8.75%28.80%22.85%22.25%21.69%4.35%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-2.52%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GWW and JPM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984

0.37

The correlation between GWW and JPM shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GWW:

$61.84B

JPM:

$869.15B

EPS

GWW:

$37.26

JPM:

$21.08

PE Ratio

GWW:

35.01

JPM:

14.76

PEG Ratio

GWW:

2.02

JPM:

1.63

PS Ratio

GWW:

3.39

JPM:

3.05

PB Ratio

GWW:

15.73

JPM:

2.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

GWW:

$18.38B

JPM:

$285.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GWW:

$7.20B

JPM:

$173.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

GWW:

$2.82B

JPM:

$81.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWW vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWW
GWW Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWW vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWWJPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.26

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.60

2.98

-0.39

GWW vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWW Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWW and JPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWWJPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.90

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.69

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.74

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.34

+0.22

Drawdowns

GWW vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWW drawdown since its inception was -56.73%, smaller than the maximum JPM drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWW and JPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWWJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.73%

-76.16%

+19.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.00%

-15.47%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.50%

-24.42%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-38.77%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.60%

-43.63%

+2.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.55%

+6.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.01%

-17.62%

+6.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.29%

6.50%

+1.79%

Volatility

GWW vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is 4.56%, while JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that GWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWWJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

6.40%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.19%

17.38%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.80%

21.62%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

24.45%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.54%

27.40%

+1.14%

Dividends

GWW vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

GWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than JPM's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.71%0.88%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.90%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%

Financials

GWW vs. JPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
4.74B
73.66B
(GWW) Total Revenue
(JPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GWW vs. JPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
40.0%
64.3%
Portfolio components
GWW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

JPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 47.33B and revenue of 73.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.3%.

GWW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

JPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 20.48B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.

GWW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

JPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 16.49B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GWW and JPM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPM has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to GWW (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWW dropped -56.73% vs JPM's -76.16%.

JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWW and JPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer