PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWSAX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWSAX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWSAX achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 12.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GWSAX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 5.92%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.69% annualized return.


GWSAX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.72%
YTD
8.60%
6M
9.63%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
5.34%
10Y*
5.92%

FSMDX

1D
0.70%
1M
4.12%
YTD
12.78%
6M
12.57%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
11.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWSAX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWSAX
Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund
8.60%2.11%13.19%11.90%-13.71%27.12%8.69%26.78%-25.30%17.07%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
12.78%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GWSAX and FSMDX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

0.84

The correlation between GWSAX and FSMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWSAX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWSAX
GWSAX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GWSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GWSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWSAX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWSAXFSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.87

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

11.06

-4.06

GWSAX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWSAX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWSAXFSMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.75

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.46

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.61

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.70

-0.35

Drawdowns

GWSAX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWSAX drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWSAX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWSAXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.75%

-40.35%

-15.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-8.16%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-20.92%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-26.07%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.67%

-40.35%

-10.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-4.96%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.11%

+0.36%

Volatility

GWSAX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) is 2.16%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that GWSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWSAXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

3.31%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.38%

9.93%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

13.42%

-3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

18.26%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

19.32%

+0.64%

GWSAX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWSAX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWSAX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

GWSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than FSMDX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.98%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%
GWSAX
Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund
4.84%5.11%4.39%4.57%5.00%3.90%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.49%1.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWSAX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMDX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to GWSAX (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWSAX dropped -55.75% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

GWSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWSAX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer