PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWPFX vs. VGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWPFX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWPFX achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 21.14% return. Over the past 10 years, GWPFX has outperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 13.34%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.53% annualized return.


GWPFX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.60%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.76%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
13.34%

VGPMX

1D
1.33%
1M
6.96%
YTD
21.14%
6M
25.95%
1Y
66.86%
3Y*
31.54%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWPFX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWPFX
American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6
11.29%20.46%20.08%28.78%-26.99%18.56%25.39%27.19%-6.61%25.09%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
21.14%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-32.26%13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GWPFX and VGPMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.54

The correlation between GWPFX and VGPMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWPFX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWPFX
GWPFX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GWPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GWPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWPFX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWPFXVGPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.69

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

5.25

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.80

21.90

-11.10

GWPFX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWPFX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWPFXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

4.02

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.19

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.55

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.26

+0.08

Drawdowns

GWPFX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWPFX drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWPFX and VGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWPFXVGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.51%

-78.85%

+26.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-12.80%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.40%

-14.63%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.15%

-22.71%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.51%

-54.59%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-34.55%

+28.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

3.06%

-0.40%

Volatility

GWPFX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) is 3.82%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that GWPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWPFXVGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

5.98%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

13.83%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

16.76%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

17.38%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.64%

20.87%

+20.77%

GWPFX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWPFX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWPFX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

GWPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than VGPMX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWPFX
American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6
5.17%5.75%5.81%1.60%9.84%3.39%3.41%5.77%6.18%3.35%4.30%4.75%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.22%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWPFX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGPMX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to GWPFX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWPFX dropped -52.51% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWPFX and VGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer