PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWOAX vs. NALFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWOAX vs. NALFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWOAX achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly lower than NALFX's 16.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GWOAX has outperformed NALFX with an annualized return of 12.43%, while NALFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.96% annualized return.


GWOAX

1D
-1.57%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
13.73%
6M
12.81%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
12.43%

NALFX

1D
-2.25%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
16.04%
6M
15.49%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
10.76%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
10.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWOAX vs. NALFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
13.73%28.37%6.14%22.49%-14.10%18.53%10.53%26.56%-12.95%25.63%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
16.04%28.13%-6.03%-2.49%-15.87%-4.78%61.74%36.98%-6.91%21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GWOAX and NALFX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.73

The correlation between GWOAX and NALFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWOAX vs. NALFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWOAX
GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

NALFX
NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWOAX vs. NALFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWOAXNALFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.31

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

3.67

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.37

10.71

+4.65

GWOAX vs. NALFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the NALFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWOAX and NALFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWOAX vs. NALFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWOAX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, smaller than the maximum NALFX drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWOAX and NALFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWOAXNALFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-59.67%

+9.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-7.53%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-24.35%

+8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

-38.03%

+11.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.28%

-42.35%

+7.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-2.68%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.97%

-14.82%

+5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.58%

-0.36%

Volatility

GWOAX vs. NALFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) is 4.57%, while New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that GWOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NALFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWOAXNALFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

5.28%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

12.64%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

15.30%

-2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

17.90%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.42%

18.02%

-1.60%

GWOAX vs. NALFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWOAX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NALFX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWOAX vs. NALFX - Dividend Comparison

GWOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than NALFX's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
3.92%4.46%0.60%6.10%7.27%12.75%3.85%4.33%3.02%3.05%6.43%12.47%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
1.01%1.17%2.04%4.47%4.63%5.14%4.93%5.55%6.62%4.16%3.71%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWOAX and NALFX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NALFX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to GWOAX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWOAX dropped -49.84% vs NALFX's -59.67%.

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWOAX and NALFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer