PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NALFX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NALFX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NALFX achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than GQFPX's 6.50% return.


NALFX

1D
0.80%
1M
1.06%
YTD
18.71%
6M
18.42%
1Y
30.46%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
11.22%

GQFPX

1D
0.31%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
6.50%
6M
6.97%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NALFX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
18.71%28.13%-6.03%-2.49%-15.87%-2.18%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
6.50%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NALFX and GQFPX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between NALFX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NALFX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NALFX
NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NALFX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NALFXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

2.17

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.18

6.49

+5.69

NALFX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NALFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NALFX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NALFX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NALFX drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NALFX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NALFXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.67%

-16.95%

-42.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-6.25%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.35%

-10.57%

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-5.96%

+5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-3.02%

-11.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.09%

+0.48%

Volatility

NALFX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.45%. This indicates that NALFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NALFXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

3.45%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

7.98%

+4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

9.84%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

12.83%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

12.83%

+5.21%

NALFX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NALFX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

NALFX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

NALFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than GQFPX's 5.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.99%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
0.98%1.17%2.04%4.47%4.63%5.14%4.93%5.55%6.62%4.16%3.71%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


NALFX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NALFX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to GQFPX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NALFX dropped -59.67% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

NALFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NALFX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer