PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWOAX vs. MBXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWOAX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWOAX achieves a 17.69% return, which is significantly higher than MBXAX's 13.56% return. Over the past 10 years, GWOAX has outperformed MBXAX with an annualized return of 12.15%, while MBXAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return.


GWOAX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.23%
6M
11.02%
YTD
17.69%
1Y
35.41%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
12.15%
ALL TIME*
8.29%

MBXAX

1D
0.73%
1M
-1.32%
6M
9.10%
YTD
13.56%
1Y
18.00%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
7.59%
ALL TIME*
8.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GWOAX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
17.69%28.37%6.14%22.49%-14.10%18.53%10.53%26.56%-12.95%25.63%
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
13.56%4.13%13.17%-0.91%7.46%16.62%-0.72%13.59%-2.43%13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GWOAX and MBXAX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.53

The correlation between GWOAX and MBXAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWOAX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GWOAX
GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXAX
MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GWOAX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWOAXMBXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

4.17

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.74

16.27

-0.53

GWOAX vs. MBXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the MBXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWOAX and MBXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWOAX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWOAX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than MBXAX's maximum drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWOAX and MBXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWOAXMBXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-31.75%

-18.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-3.89%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-15.66%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

-15.66%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.28%

-31.75%

-3.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.98%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-4.00%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.01%

+1.20%

Volatility

GWOAX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) at 1.78%. This indicates that GWOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWOAXMBXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

1.78%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

4.91%

+5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

6.90%

+5.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

11.39%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.39%

13.36%

+3.03%

GWOAX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWOAX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWOAX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison

GWOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, while MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
5.37%4.46%0.60%6.10%7.27%12.75%3.85%4.33%3.02%3.05%6.43%12.47%
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%2.43%2.02%7.57%0.00%3.92%4.96%3.07%3.35%1.82%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWOAX and MBXAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWOAX has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to MBXAX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWOAX dropped -49.84% vs MBXAX's -31.75%.

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWOAX and MBXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer