GWILX vs. LEXCX
GWILX (Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio) and LEXCX (Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GWILX returned 10.31%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for LEXCX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GWILX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for LEXCX.
Performance
GWILX vs. LEXCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWILX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than LEXCX's 14.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GWILX has underperformed LEXCX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while LEXCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.
GWILX
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- 8.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
LEXCX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 14.68%
- 1Y
- 17.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
GWILX vs. LEXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWILX Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio | -0.23% | 8.19% | 15.76% | 17.36% | -13.71% | 24.45% | 7.84% | 26.88% | -8.65% | 22.90% |
LEXCX Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund | 14.99% | 7.04% | 3.60% | 14.53% | 3.95% | 26.77% | 4.36% | 21.43% | -5.44% | 16.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWILX and LEXCX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GWILX and LEXCX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWILX vs. LEXCX — Risk / Return Rank
GWILX
LEXCX
GWILX vs. LEXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GWILX | LEXCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.25 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 3.19 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 7.85 | -6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GWILX vs. LEXCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWILX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, smaller than the maximum LEXCX drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWILX and LEXCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWILX | LEXCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -50.42% | +12.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -6.22% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.73% | -14.03% | -11.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.73% | -19.75% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.22% | -39.21% | +0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.71% | -5.61% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -7.12% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 2.48% | +2.10% |
Volatility
GWILX vs. LEXCX - Volatility Comparison
Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) at 4.73%. This indicates that GWILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWILX | LEXCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 4.73% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.35% | 10.93% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.20% | 14.06% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 16.52% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 19.01% | +0.16% |
GWILX vs. LEXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GWILX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LEXCX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
GWILX vs. LEXCX - Dividend Comparison
GWILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.03%, more than LEXCX's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWILX Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio | 94.03% | 94.11% | 13.95% | 5.36% | 3.42% | 21.17% | 0.94% | 0.92% | 4.73% | 1.17% | 1.44% | 0.00% |
LEXCX Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.66% | 1.58% | 1.65% | 1.54% | 1.91% | 1.86% | 2.03% | 1.79% | 3.93% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GWILX and LEXCX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GWILX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to LEXCX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWILX dropped -38.22% vs LEXCX's -50.42%.
LEXCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GWILX and LEXCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer