GWILX vs. BUFBX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GWILX (Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio) and BUFBX (Buffalo Flexible Income Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GWILX returned 10.31%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for BUFBX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GWILX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for BUFBX.

Performance

GWILX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWILX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than BUFBX's 8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GWILX has outperformed BUFBX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while BUFBX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.49% annualized return.

GWILX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: -2.03%
• 1Y: 8.68%
• 3Y*: 10.84%
• 5Y*: 6.20%
• 10Y*: 10.31%

BUFBX

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 8.15%
• 1Y: 14.29%
• 3Y*: 11.59%
• 5Y*: 10.73%
• 10Y*: 9.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWILX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GWILX Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio	-0.23%	8.19%	15.76%	17.36%	-13.71%	24.45%	7.84%	26.88%	-8.65%	22.90%
BUFBX Buffalo Flexible Income Fund	8.04%	10.37%	10.26%	7.42%	3.97%	29.97%	-2.27%	18.76%	-7.01%	13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GWILX and BUFBX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between GWILX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GWILX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWILX

GWILX Risk / Return Rank: 7
GWILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GWILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GWILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GWILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
GWILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BUFBX

BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 47
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWILX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GWILX	BUFBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	1.56	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	2.19	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.27	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	3.21	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.78	11.59	-9.81

GWILX vs. BUFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWILX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the BUFBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWILX and BUFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GWILX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWILX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, roughly equal to the maximum BUFBX drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWILX and BUFBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GWILX	BUFBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.22%	-39.78%	+1.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-4.45%	-8.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.73%	-12.85%	-12.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.73%	-14.67%	-11.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.22%	-35.51%	-2.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.71%	-4.45%	-2.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.93%	-4.72%	-1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	1.23%	+3.35%

Volatility

GWILX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio (GWILX) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) at 3.42%. This indicates that GWILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GWILX	BUFBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	3.42%	+2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.35%	6.93%	+4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.20%	9.18%	+6.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.39%	13.42%	+4.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.17%	15.61%	+3.56%

GWILX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWILX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

GWILX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison

GWILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.03%, more than BUFBX's 8.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUFBX Buffalo Flexible Income Fund	8.43%	9.10%	3.77%	3.48%	4.16%	5.57%	3.33%	2.73%	6.01%	5.49%	2.39%	3.67%
GWILX Glenmede Women in Leadership U.S. Equity Portfolio	94.03%	94.11%	13.95%	5.36%	3.42%	21.17%	0.94%	0.92%	4.73%	1.17%	1.44%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GWILX and BUFBX in my portfolio?

GWILX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GWILX or BUFBX?

GWILX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to BUFBX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWILX dropped -38.22% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.