PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWH vs. NRGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GWH vs. NRGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWH achieves a -60.27% return, which is significantly lower than NRGV's -38.18% return.


GWH

1D
-1.53%
1M
-13.44%
6M
-57.31%
YTD
-60.27%
1Y
-56.32%
3Y*
-69.92%
5Y*
-65.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-61.55%

NRGV

1D
0.71%
1M
-29.46%
6M
-39.36%
YTD
-38.18%
1Y
171.43%
3Y*
-5.06%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$579.06K$560.59K$768.83K
$12.02M$14.40M$24.49M

GWH vs. NRGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GWH
ESS Tech, Inc.
-60.27%-68.03%-65.61%-53.09%-50.91%
NRGV
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
-38.18%102.19%-2.15%-25.32%-72.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GWH and NRGV is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2022

0.31

The correlation between GWH and NRGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GWH:

$9.41M

NRGV:

$516.53M

EPS

GWH:

-$2.15

NRGV:

-$0.69

PS Ratio

GWH:

14.19

NRGV:

2.20

PB Ratio

GWH:

2.32

NRGV:

16.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

GWH:

$1.11M

NRGV:

$217.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GWH:

-$32.30M

NRGV:

$47.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

GWH:

-$47.24M

NRGV:

-$75.37M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWH vs. NRGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GWH
GWH Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GWH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWH Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GWH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWH Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGV
NRGV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NRGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GWH vs. NRGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWHNRGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.26

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

2.43

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.83

5.11

-5.94

GWH vs. NRGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWH Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the NRGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWH and NRGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWH vs. NRGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWH drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum NRGV drawdown of -97.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWH and NRGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWHNRGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-97.09%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.10%

-61.33%

-30.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.61%

-80.68%

-16.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.79%

-86.83%

-12.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.36%

-82.74%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

73.11%

29.06%

+44.05%

Volatility

GWH vs. NRGV - Volatility Comparison

ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) has a higher volatility of 33.80% compared to Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) at 31.52%. This indicates that GWH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWHNRGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.80%

31.52%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.53%

77.19%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

215.17%

106.17%

+109.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

154.61%

113.49%

+41.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.43%

113.49%

+32.94%

Dividends

GWH vs. NRGV - Dividend Comparison

Neither GWH nor NRGV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GWH vs. NRGV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ESS Tech, Inc. and Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GWH and NRGV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWH has higher volatility (33.80%) compared to NRGV (31.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWH dropped -99.80% vs NRGV's -97.09%.

NRGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWH and NRGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer