GWH vs. GRID
GWH (ESS Tech, Inc.) is a stock, while GRID (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Over the past 5 years, GWH returned -63.81%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for GRID. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GWH vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWH achieves a -51.06% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.91% return.
GWH
- 1D
- -6.12%
- 1M
- -17.12%
- YTD
- -51.06%
- 6M
- -59.47%
- 1Y
- -30.83%
- 3Y*
- -63.49%
- 5Y*
- -63.81%
- 10Y*
- —
GRID
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 28.91%
- 6M
- 29.60%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
GWH vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWH ESS Tech, Inc. | -51.06% | -68.03% | -65.61% | -53.09% | -78.76% | 13.27% |
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 28.91% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | -13.89% | 28.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWH and GRID is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2021 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWH vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
GWH
GRID
GWH vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GWH | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | 2.67 | -2.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 3.50 | -1.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.45 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 4.42 | -4.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 16.72 | -17.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GWH | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | 2.67 | -2.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.85 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.57 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
GWH vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWH drawdown since its inception was -99.78%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWH and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWH | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.78% | -40.56% | -59.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.46% | -11.73% | -79.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.41% | -20.77% | -76.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.78% | -29.64% | -70.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.74% | -1.33% | -98.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.82% | -8.43% | -70.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.31% | 3.09% | +62.22% |
Volatility
GWH vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) has a higher volatility of 47.06% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) at 7.95%. This indicates that GWH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWH | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 47.06% | 7.95% | +39.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.85% | 16.08% | +49.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 221.52% | 19.39% | +202.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 153.29% | 21.00% | +132.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 147.35% | 22.81% | +124.54% |
Dividends
GWH vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
GWH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 0.77% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
GWH ESS Tech, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GWH and GRID have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GWH has higher volatility (47.06%) compared to GRID (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWH dropped -99.78% vs GRID's -40.56%.
GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GWH and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer