GWH vs. CLX
GWH (ESS Tech, Inc.) and CLX (The Clorox Company) are both stocks. GWH operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while CLX operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, GWH returned -65.34%/yr vs -9.05%/yr for CLX. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GWH vs. CLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWH achieves a -60.27% return, which is significantly lower than CLX's -3.00% return.
GWH
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -13.44%
- 6M
- -57.31%
- YTD
- -60.27%
- 1Y
- -56.32%
- 3Y*
- -69.92%
- 5Y*
- -65.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -61.55%
CLX
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- 6M
- -14.24%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -18.90%
- 3Y*
- -11.07%
- 5Y*
- -9.05%
- 10Y*
- -0.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $216.17M | $226.67M | $248.74M | |
| $579.06K | $560.59K | $768.83K |
GWH vs. CLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWH ESS Tech, Inc. | -60.27% | -68.03% | -65.61% | -53.09% | -78.76% | 12.16% |
CLX The Clorox Company | -3.00% | -35.59% | 17.72% | 4.99% | -17.00% | -11.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWH and CLX is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
GWH:
$9.41M
CLX:
$11.55B
GWH:
-$2.15
CLX:
$6.18
GWH:
14.19
CLX:
1.73
GWH:
$1.11M
CLX:
$6.76B
GWH:
-$32.30M
CLX:
$2.96B
GWH:
-$47.24M
CLX:
$1.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWH vs. CLX — Risk / Return Rank
GWH
CLX
GWH vs. CLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) and The Clorox Company (CLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GWH | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.90 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.65 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | -1.22 | +0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GWH vs. CLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWH drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than CLX's maximum drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWH and CLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWH | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -56.34% | -43.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -92.10% | -31.42% | -60.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.61% | -46.11% | -51.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.80% | -46.11% | -53.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.79% | -51.57% | -48.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.36% | -13.55% | -65.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 73.11% | 16.87% | +56.24% |
Volatility
GWH vs. CLX - Volatility Comparison
ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) has a higher volatility of 33.80% compared to The Clorox Company (CLX) at 8.98%. This indicates that GWH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWH | CLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.80% | 8.98% | +24.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 74.53% | 25.20% | +49.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.17% | 29.37% | +185.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 154.61% | 26.43% | +128.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.43% | 24.75% | +121.68% |
Dividends
GWH vs. CLX - Dividend Comparison
GWH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLX The Clorox Company | 5.19% | 4.88% | 2.98% | 3.34% | 3.33% | 2.60% | 2.15% | 2.63% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 2.62% | 2.38% |
GWH ESS Tech, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GWH vs. CLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ESS Tech, Inc. and The Clorox Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GWH and CLX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GWH has higher volatility (33.80%) compared to CLX (8.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWH dropped -99.80% vs CLX's -56.34%.
GWH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GWH and CLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer