PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVIP vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVIP vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GVIP having a 12.32% return and QARP slightly higher at 12.78%.


GVIP

1D
-2.55%
1M
-3.96%
6M
9.31%
YTD
12.32%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
25.82%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*

QARP

1D
0.71%
1M
1.10%
6M
9.34%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVIP vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
12.32%25.27%29.82%39.15%-31.95%11.86%44.12%30.21%-7.49%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.78%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GVIP and QARP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.82

The correlation between GVIP and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GVIP vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVIP
QARP

Technology

34.8%
23.5%

Financial Services

16.0%
12.1%

Communication Services

13.7%
11.3%

Industrials

11.0%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.6%

Healthcare

8.2%
13.9%

Utilities

6.3%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
9.6%

Basic Materials

-

2.3%

Energy

-

5.8%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

GVIP
34.8%
QARP
23.5%

Financial Services

GVIP
16.0%
QARP
12.1%

Communication Services

GVIP
13.7%
QARP
11.3%

Industrials

GVIP
11.0%
QARP
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GVIP
10.0%
QARP
9.6%

Healthcare

GVIP
8.2%
QARP
13.9%

Utilities

GVIP
6.3%
QARP
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

GVIP
1.2%
QARP
9.6%

Basic Materials

GVIP

-

QARP
2.3%

Energy

GVIP

-

QARP
5.8%

Real Estate

GVIP

-

QARP
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVIP vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVIP vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVIPQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.46

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

15.38

-8.10

GVIP vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVIP and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVIP vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVIP drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVIP and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVIPQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.09%

-35.44%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-7.26%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

-15.65%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.09%

-22.75%

-14.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

0.00%

-9.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-4.39%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

1.63%

+1.93%

Volatility

GVIP vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that GVIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVIPQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.63%

2.76%

+7.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.91%

8.22%

+10.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.95%

10.58%

+11.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

15.54%

+6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.92%

19.55%

+2.37%

GVIP vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVIP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVIP vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.30%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVIP and QARP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVIP has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVIP dropped -37.09% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 12.08% for GVIP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.30% for GVIP.

GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVIP and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVIP and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer