GVIP vs. QARP
GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GVIP tracks the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GVIP returned 12.08%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVIP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
GVIP vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GVIP having a 12.32% return and QARP slightly higher at 12.78%.
GVIP
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- —
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
GVIP vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 12.32% | 25.27% | 29.82% | 39.15% | -31.95% | 11.86% | 44.12% | 30.21% | -7.49% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVIP and QARP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between GVIP and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GVIP vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVIP
QARP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
GVIP
QARP
Financial Services
GVIP
QARP
Communication Services
GVIP
QARP
Industrials
GVIP
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
GVIP
QARP
Healthcare
GVIP
QARP
Utilities
GVIP
QARP
Consumer Defensive
GVIP
QARP
Basic Materials
GVIP
-
QARP
Energy
GVIP
-
QARP
Real Estate
GVIP
-
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVIP vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
GVIP
QARP
GVIP vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GVIP | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.43 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 3.46 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | 15.38 | -8.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GVIP vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVIP drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVIP and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVIP | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -35.44% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -7.26% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.29% | -15.65% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.09% | -22.75% | -14.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.26% | 0.00% | -9.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -4.39% | -3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 1.63% | +1.93% |
Volatility
GVIP vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that GVIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVIP | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 2.76% | +7.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.91% | 8.22% | +10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 10.58% | +11.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 15.54% | +6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 19.55% | +2.37% |
GVIP vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVIP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVIP vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 0.30% | 0.34% | 0.29% | 0.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVIP and QARP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVIP has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVIP dropped -37.09% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 12.08% for GVIP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.30% for GVIP.
GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVIP and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVIP and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer