GVIP vs. GURU
GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) and GURU (Global X Guru Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GVIP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, while GURU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive Guru Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GVIP returned 10.95%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for GURU. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GVIP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GURU.
Performance
GVIP vs. GURU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVIP achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than GURU's 7.75% return.
GVIP
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -6.63%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.41%
GURU
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 24.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $83.27K | $71.87K | $80.18K | |
| $2.23M | $1.88M | $2.26M |
GVIP vs. GURU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 8.45% | 25.27% | 29.82% | 39.15% | -31.95% | 11.86% | 44.12% | 30.21% | -6.85% | 25.79% |
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 7.75% | 25.43% | 23.76% | 19.28% | -27.94% | 8.19% | 25.27% | 30.99% | -6.56% | 24.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVIP and GURU is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between GVIP and GURU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
GVIP vs. GURU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVIP
GURU
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
GVIP
GURU
Financial Services
GVIP
GURU
Communication Services
GVIP
GURU
Industrials
GVIP
GURU
Consumer Cyclical
GVIP
GURU
Healthcare
GVIP
GURU
Utilities
GVIP
GURU
Consumer Defensive
GVIP
GURU
Basic Materials
GVIP
-
GURU
Energy
GVIP
-
GURU
Real Estate
GVIP
-
GURU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVIP vs. GURU — Risk / Return Rank
GVIP
GURU
GVIP vs. GURU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GVIP | GURU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 2.06 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 7.17 | -2.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GVIP vs. GURU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVIP drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, roughly equal to the maximum GURU drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVIP and GURU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVIP | GURU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -38.50% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.36% | -11.22% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.29% | -20.73% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.09% | -38.50% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.39% | -3.84% | -8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -8.59% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 3.22% | +1.04% |
Volatility
GVIP vs. GURU - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) at 4.83%. This indicates that GVIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GURU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVIP | GURU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 4.83% | +4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.33% | 13.64% | +6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.29% | 16.60% | +6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 20.56% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 20.18% | +1.84% |
GVIP vs. GURU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVIP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GURU's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVIP vs. GURU - Dividend Comparison
GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than GURU's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.57% | 0.22% | 0.09% | 2.75% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.22% | 0.47% |
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | 0.31% | 0.34% | 0.29% | 0.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.77% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVIP and GURU have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVIP has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to GURU (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVIP dropped -37.09% vs GURU's -38.50%.
On 5-year performance, GVIP leads with 10.95% vs 7.19% for GURU. On fees, GVIP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GURU has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 10.95% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GVIP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GURU.
GVIP has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.08% for GURU.
GVIP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GURU is Large Cap Blend Equities. GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, while GURU tracks Solactive Guru Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVIP and 0.75% for GURU.
GURU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVIP and GURU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer