GVAL vs. FDD
GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) and FDD (First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while FDD is a Europe Equities fund tracking the STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. GVAL is actively managed, while FDD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GVAL returned 11.46%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for FDD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GVAL charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FDD.
Performance
GVAL vs. FDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly higher than FDD's 13.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GVAL having a 11.46% annualized return and FDD not far behind at 10.93%.
GVAL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 40.92%
- 3Y*
- 26.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
FDD
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- 1Y
- 33.97%
- 3Y*
- 26.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
GVAL vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 16.63% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 29.50% |
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 13.65% | 62.50% | 0.28% | 14.16% | -16.14% | 16.03% | -3.80% | 23.79% | -8.98% | 19.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVAL and FDD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014 | 0.77 |
The correlation between GVAL and FDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
GVAL vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVAL
FDD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
GVAL
FDD
Basic Materials
GVAL
FDD
Energy
GVAL
FDD
Real Estate
GVAL
FDD
Technology
GVAL
FDD
-
Communication Services
GVAL
FDD
Utilities
GVAL
FDD
Industrials
GVAL
FDD
Consumer Cyclical
GVAL
FDD
Consumer Defensive
GVAL
FDD
Healthcare
GVAL
-
FDD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVAL vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank
GVAL
FDD
GVAL vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GVAL | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.36 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 3.58 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.27 | 11.88 | +1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GVAL vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and FDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVAL | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.82% | -74.77% | +27.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -9.39% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.72% | -13.06% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -35.11% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.82% | -41.43% | -5.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.40% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.85% | -35.41% | +21.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.83% | +0.19% |
Volatility
GVAL vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) have volatilities of 6.00% and 5.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVAL | FDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 5.91% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 12.98% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 15.93% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 18.48% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 20.16% | -0.96% |
GVAL vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVAL has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVAL vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison
GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than FDD's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDD First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund | 3.48% | 3.99% | 7.65% | 6.85% | 6.07% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 4.69% | 5.05% | 2.78% | 4.88% | 4.35% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.77% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVAL and FDD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVAL has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to FDD (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs FDD's -74.77%.
On 10-year performance, GVAL leads with 11.46% vs 10.93% for FDD. On fees, FDD is cheaper at 0.58% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 11.46% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDD is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.
FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 2.77% for GVAL.
GVAL is categorized as Global Equities, while FDD is Europe Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for GVAL and 0.58% for FDD.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVAL and FDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer