GUSE vs. PSMD
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and PSMD (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while PSMD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSMD.
Performance
GUSE vs. PSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than PSMD's 5.98% return.
GUSE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSMD
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 12.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- —
GUSE vs. PSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 11.48% | 2.38% |
PSMD Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF | 5.98% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and PSMD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. PSMD — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSMD
GUSE vs. PSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSE | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. PSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum PSMD drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and PSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -11.96% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.28% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -1.64% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. PSMD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 5.76% | +8.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 8.64% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 8.44% | +5.51% |
GUSE vs. PSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PSMD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. PSMD - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while PSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSMD Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSE and PSMD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSMD.
GUSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for PSMD.
GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSMD is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.75% for PSMD.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and PSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer