GUSE vs. GSG
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. GUSE is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
GUSE vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 25.54% return.
GUSE
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -12.93%
- YTD
- 25.54%
- 6M
- 23.88%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.58%
GUSE vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 9.12% | 2.38% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 25.54% | -0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and GSG is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSG
GUSE vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSE | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -89.62% | +81.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -62.10% | +59.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -63.69% | +62.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.01% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.29% | 23.17% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 22.67% | -8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 22.01% | -7.72% |
GUSE vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSE and GSG have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
GUSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.75% for GSG.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer