PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSE vs. FENY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSE vs. FENY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than FENY's 35.12% return.


GUSE

1D
0.76%
1M
0.25%
6M
9.66%
YTD
11.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

FENY

1D
1.04%
1M
11.58%
6M
18.35%
YTD
35.12%
1Y
43.91%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
23.67%
10Y*
9.96%
ALL TIME*
5.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$45.95M$44.20M$53.46M
$364.55K$258.31K$277.29K

GUSE vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GUSE and FENY is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSE vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GUSE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FENY
FENY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GUSE vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUSEFENYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

GUSE vs. FENY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUSE vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and FENY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSEFENYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-74.35%

+65.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-4.34%

+3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-22.95%

+21.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

Volatility

GUSE vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSEFENYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

20.94%

-7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

26.20%

-12.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

29.78%

-15.95%

GUSE vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSE vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison

GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than FENY's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
2.35%3.18%3.05%3.33%3.33%3.69%4.60%6.43%3.21%2.94%2.29%3.05%
GUSE
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF
0.65%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUSE and FENY have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GUSE.

FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.65% for GUSE.

GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FENY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.08% for FENY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSE and FENY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer