GURU vs. USMV
GURU (Global X Guru Index ETF) and USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GURU tracks the Solactive Guru Index while USMV tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GURU returned 12.14%/yr vs 9.44%/yr for USMV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GURU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USMV.
Performance
GURU vs. USMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GURU achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 3.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GURU has outperformed USMV with an annualized return of 12.14%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.44% annualized return.
GURU
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 23.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
USMV
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
GURU vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 8.22% | 25.43% | 23.76% | 19.28% | -27.94% | 8.19% | 25.27% | 30.99% | -6.56% | 24.26% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.34% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 18.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between GURU and USMV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2012 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GURU and USMV has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GURU vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GURU
USMV
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
GURU
USMV
Technology
GURU
USMV
Industrials
GURU
USMV
Consumer Cyclical
GURU
USMV
Financial Services
GURU
USMV
Utilities
GURU
USMV
Communication Services
GURU
USMV
Energy
GURU
USMV
Basic Materials
GURU
USMV
Consumer Defensive
GURU
USMV
Real Estate
GURU
USMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GURU vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank
GURU
USMV
GURU vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GURU | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.11 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 0.84 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.62 | 2.75 | +4.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GURU vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than USMV's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and USMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GURU | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.50% | -33.10% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.22% | -6.46% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.73% | -9.36% | -11.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.50% | -17.93% | -20.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | -33.10% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -1.78% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.61% | -2.86% | -5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 1.98% | +1.14% |
Volatility
GURU vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison
Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 3.01%. This indicates that GURU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GURU | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 3.01% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.41% | 6.43% | +6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 8.53% | +7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 12.38% | +8.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 14.50% | +5.65% |
GURU vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GURU vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison
GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than USMV's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.57% | 0.22% | 0.09% | 2.75% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.22% | 0.47% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.49% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GURU and USMV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GURU has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to USMV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GURU dropped -38.50% vs USMV's -33.10%.
On 10-year performance, GURU leads with 12.14% vs 9.44% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GURU has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 9.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GURU.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.08% for GURU.
GURU tracks Solactive Guru Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 0.15% for USMV.
GURU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GURU and USMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer