PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GURU vs. GVIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GURU vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GURU achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's 16.17% return.


GURU

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.20%
YTD
7.06%
6M
6.09%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
23.93%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
12.16%

GVIP

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.71%
YTD
16.17%
6M
18.08%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GURU vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GURU
Global X Guru Index ETF
7.06%25.43%23.76%19.28%-27.94%8.19%25.27%30.99%-6.56%24.26%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
16.17%25.27%29.82%39.15%-31.95%11.86%44.12%30.21%-6.85%25.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GURU and GVIP is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2016

0.88

The correlation between GURU and GVIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GURU vs. GVIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GURU
GVIP

Technology

25.2%
38.6%

Healthcare

23.5%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
8.0%

Industrials

10.6%
9.5%

Financial Services

9.4%
15.8%

Utilities

5.4%
8.4%

Communication Services

5.3%
11.5%

Energy

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Technology

GURU
25.2%
GVIP
38.6%

Healthcare

GURU
23.5%
GVIP
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GURU
11.0%
GVIP
8.0%

Industrials

GURU
10.6%
GVIP
9.5%

Financial Services

GURU
9.4%
GVIP
15.8%

Utilities

GURU
5.4%
GVIP
8.4%

Communication Services

GURU
5.3%
GVIP
11.5%

Energy

GURU
4.3%
GVIP

-

Basic Materials

GURU
2.1%
GVIP

-

Consumer Defensive

GURU
1.9%
GVIP
1.2%

Real Estate

GURU
1.2%
GVIP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GURU vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GURU
GURU Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GURU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GURU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GURU Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GURU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GURU Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GURU vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GURUGVIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.71

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

11.81

-2.69

GURU vs. GVIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GURU Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the GVIP Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GURU and GVIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GURUGVIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.05

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.61

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.82

-0.18

Drawdowns

GURU vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, roughly equal to the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and GVIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GURUGVIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.50%

-37.09%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-13.67%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.73%

-23.29%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-37.09%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.33%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-7.59%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.14%

-0.07%

Volatility

GURU vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) is 4.33%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that GURU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GURUGVIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

5.42%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

14.47%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

18.13%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

21.29%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

21.65%

-1.49%

GURU vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GURU vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than GVIP's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GURU
Global X Guru Index ETF
0.11%0.11%0.17%0.57%0.22%0.09%2.75%0.35%0.54%0.54%0.22%0.47%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.29%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GURU and GVIP have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVIP has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to GURU (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GURU dropped -38.50% vs GVIP's -37.09%.

On 5-year performance, GVIP leads with 12.90% vs 7.41% for GURU. On fees, GVIP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GURU has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GVIP has performed better with a 12.90% return vs 7.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GVIP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GURU.

GVIP has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.11% for GURU.

GURU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GVIP is Large Cap Growth Equities. GURU tracks Solactive Guru Index, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 0.45% for GVIP.

GVIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GURU and GVIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer