GURU vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GURU (Global X Guru Index ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GURU is passively managed, while CNAV is actively managed. Over the past year, GURU returned 30.14% vs 76.91% for CNAV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GURU charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

GURU vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GURU achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 51.25% return.

GURU

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 30.14%
• 3Y*: 24.36%
• 5Y*: 7.12%
• 10Y*: 13.28%

CNAV

• 1D: 4.10%
• 1M: 9.21%
• YTD: 51.25%
• 6M: 48.47%
• 1Y: 76.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GURU vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF	10.08%	25.43%	4.30%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	51.25%	16.80%	6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GURU and CNAV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.75

The correlation between GURU and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GURU vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GURU

GURU Risk / Return Rank: 63
GURU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
GURU Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GURU Omega Ratio Rank: 61
GURU Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
GURU Martin Ratio Rank: 62

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 89
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GURU vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GURU	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.65	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.18	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.44	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	5.96	-3.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.74	23.29	-13.55

GURU vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GURU Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GURU and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GURU vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than CNAV's maximum drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GURU	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.50%	-30.06%	-8.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.22%	-12.97%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-3.01%	+2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.64%	-5.38%	-3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	3.31%	-0.21%

Volatility

GURU vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) is 5.88%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 16.44%. This indicates that GURU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GURU	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	16.44%	-10.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.13%	25.82%	-12.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.20%	29.20%	-13.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.55%	29.11%	-8.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.18%	29.11%	-8.93%

GURU vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

GURU vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF	0.10%	0.11%	0.17%	0.57%	0.22%	0.09%	2.75%	0.35%	0.54%	0.54%	0.22%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GURU and CNAV in my portfolio?

GURU and CNAV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GURU or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (16.44%) compared to GURU (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GURU dropped -38.50% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, GURU or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 76.91% vs 30.14% for GURU. On fees, GURU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GURU has been the lower-risk option at 5.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GURU or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 76.91% return vs 30.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GURU or CNAV?

GURU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GURU or CNAV?

GURU has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between GURU and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.