GURIX vs. FIKLX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GURIX (Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund) and FIKLX (Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, GURIX returned 3.61%/yr vs -3.48%/yr for FIKLX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GURIX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FIKLX.

Performance

GURIX vs. FIKLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GURIX achieves a 10.89% return, which is significantly higher than FIKLX's -4.29% return.

GURIX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.50%
• YTD: 10.89%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 11.51%
• 3Y*: 9.49%
• 5Y*: 3.61%
• 10Y*: 7.40%

FIKLX

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -4.38%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: -2.45%
• 1Y: 2.83%
• 3Y*: 3.50%
• 5Y*: -3.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GURIX vs. FIKLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund	10.89%	2.04%	4.96%	13.01%	-23.81%	42.07%	1.76%	25.54%	-1.65%
FIKLX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z	-4.29%	22.93%	-9.39%	4.32%	-26.54%	12.03%	5.85%	28.22%	-2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GURIX and FIKLX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018	0.53

The correlation between GURIX and FIKLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GURIX vs. FIKLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GURIX

GURIX Risk / Return Rank: 14
GURIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
GURIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
GURIX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
GURIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
GURIX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FIKLX

FIKLX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FIKLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FIKLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FIKLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FIKLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FIKLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GURIX vs. FIKLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GURIX	FIKLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	0.27	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	0.47	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.06	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	0.24	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.76	0.64	+4.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GURIX vs. FIKLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GURIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the FIKLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GURIX and FIKLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GURIX	FIKLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	0.27	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	-0.26	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.18	+0.23

Drawdowns

GURIX vs. FIKLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GURIX drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, smaller than the maximum FIKLX drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURIX and FIKLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GURIX	FIKLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.32%	-36.93%	+3.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.07%	-13.77%	+5.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.62%	-18.09%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.30%	-36.93%	+6.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.85%	-20.54%	+17.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.90%	-15.72%	+7.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	5.08%	-2.64%

Volatility

GURIX vs. FIKLX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX) at 3.69%. This indicates that GURIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GURIX	FIKLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	3.69%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.95%	9.78%	-0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57%	12.02%	+0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	13.69%	+3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.99%	14.74%	+3.25%

GURIX vs. FIKLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GURIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKLX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

GURIX vs. FIKLX - Dividend Comparison

GURIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than FIKLX's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIKLX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z	3.23%	3.10%	5.24%	2.12%	4.60%	5.63%	1.94%	5.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund	2.04%	2.40%	5.18%	3.07%	6.79%	5.60%	7.81%	6.25%	3.05%	5.37%	4.52%	16.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GURIX and FIKLX in my portfolio?

GURIX and FIKLX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GURIX or FIKLX?

GURIX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FIKLX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GURIX dropped -33.32% vs FIKLX's -36.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GURIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.