PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUNR vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUNR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUNR achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 11.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GUNR has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.26%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.50% annualized return.


GUNR

1D
-0.13%
1M
6.07%
6M
3.93%
YTD
15.47%
1Y
29.81%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
10.26%
ALL TIME*
6.58%

QQQ

1D
-1.12%
1M
-4.49%
6M
10.14%
YTD
11.64%
1Y
21.39%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
20.50%
ALL TIME*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.72M$19.11M$19.24M
$25.72B$27.46B$30.43B

GUNR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
15.47%30.03%-8.37%-2.40%14.83%26.06%0.46%18.41%-9.42%18.74%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
11.64%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GUNR and QQQ is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2011

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between GUNR and QQQ has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GUNR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GUNR
QQQ

Basic Materials

52.3%
1.0%

Energy

29.2%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.8%
6.3%

Utilities

5.4%
1.1%

Communication Services

1.7%
13.1%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.1%

Technology

0.5%
60.9%

Industrials

0.5%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
10.7%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.2%

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Basic Materials

GUNR
52.3%
QQQ
1.0%

Energy

GUNR
29.2%
QQQ
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

GUNR
11.8%
QQQ
6.3%

Utilities

GUNR
5.4%
QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

GUNR
1.7%
QQQ
13.1%

Real Estate

GUNR
1.2%
QQQ
0.1%

Technology

GUNR
0.5%
QQQ
60.9%

Industrials

GUNR
0.5%
QQQ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GUNR
0.4%
QQQ
10.7%

Financial Services

GUNR
0.0%
QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

GUNR

-

QQQ
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUNR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUNR
GUNR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUNR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUNRQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

1.82

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

6.19

+1.98

GUNR vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUNR and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUNR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUNR drawdown since its inception was -45.64%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUNR and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUNRQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.64%

-82.97%

+37.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-11.96%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-22.77%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.06%

-35.12%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.04%

-35.12%

-7.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.61%

-8.20%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-32.64%

+22.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

3.51%

+0.13%

Volatility

GUNR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) is 3.48%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that GUNR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUNRQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

6.74%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

15.61%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.91%

18.96%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

22.83%

-3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

22.46%

-2.15%

GUNR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUNR has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUNR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

GUNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
2.32%2.81%3.39%3.55%4.12%3.61%2.79%3.25%3.27%2.00%1.73%4.50%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUNR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to GUNR (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUNR dropped -45.64% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.50% vs 10.26% for GUNR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, GUNR has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.50% return vs 10.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.

GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.

GUNR is categorized as Natural Resources, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. GUNR tracks Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GUNR and 0.18% for QQQ.

GUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUNR and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer