GUMI vs. THYM
GUMI (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF) and THYM (T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while THYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GUMI charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for THYM.
Performance
GUMI vs. THYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUMI achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than THYM's 3.33% return.
GUMI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THYM
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUMI vs. THYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 1.06% | 0.45% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 3.33% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUMI and THYM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUMI vs. THYM — Risk / Return Rank
GUMI
THYM
GUMI vs. THYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) and T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUMI | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.92 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.70 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.93 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUMI | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.29 | 1.62 | +1.67 |
Drawdowns
GUMI vs. THYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUMI drawdown since its inception was -0.48%, smaller than the maximum THYM drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUMI and THYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUMI | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -2.93% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.49% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | — | — |
Volatility
GUMI vs. THYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUMI | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09% | 4.35% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.99% | 4.35% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.99% | 4.35% | -3.36% |
GUMI vs. THYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUMI has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than THYM's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUMI vs. THYM - Dividend Comparison
GUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than THYM's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 2.77% | 2.95% | 1.37% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 2.18% | 0.37% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUMI and THYM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GUMI is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GUMI is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for THYM.
GUMI has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.18% for THYM.
GUMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while THYM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for GUMI and 0.32% for THYM.
Find the right allocation for GUMI and THYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer