GUMI vs. BSMP
GUMI (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF) and BSMP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. GUMI is actively managed, while BSMP is passively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GUMI charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMP.
Performance
GUMI vs. BSMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GUMI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUMI vs. BSMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 1.30% | 3.39% | 1.57% |
BSMP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.00% | 2.27% | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUMI and BSMP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024 | 0.03 |
The correlation between GUMI and BSMP shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUMI vs. BSMP — Risk / Return Rank
GUMI
BSMP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GUMI vs. BSMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUMI | BSMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.16 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUMI vs. BSMP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUMI | BSMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | — | — |
Volatility
GUMI vs. BSMP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUMI | BSMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.97% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.97% | — | — |
GUMI vs. BSMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUMI has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than BSMP's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GUMI vs. BSMP - Dividend Comparison
GUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than BSMP's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.05% | 2.35% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 1.23% | 0.72% | 1.32% | 0.35% |
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 2.77% | 2.95% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUMI and BSMP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GUMI is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GUMI is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMP.
GUMI has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.05% for BSMP.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for GUMI and 0.18% for BSMP.
Find the right allocation for GUMI and BSMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer