GUIRX vs. GSRAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX).
GUIRX is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010. GSRAX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 23, 2004.
Performance
GUIRX vs. GSRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GUIRX vs. GSRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class | -0.45% | 4.73% | 3.66% | 6.37% | -9.66% | 3.11% | 3.86% | 7.80% | 3.09% | 5.81% |
GSRAX Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund | -1.37% | 6.66% | 26.07% | 17.49% | -7.78% | 31.47% | 8.75% | 25.63% | -6.65% | 17.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUIRX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than GSRAX's -1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, GUIRX has underperformed GSRAX with an annualized return of 2.72%, while GSRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.
GUIRX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
GSRAX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- YTD
- -1.37%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 6.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUIRX vs. GSRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUIRX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GSRAX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GUIRX vs. GSRAX — Risk / Return Rank
GUIRX
GSRAX
GUIRX vs. GSRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUIRX | GSRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.44 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 0.75 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.11 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 0.40 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | 1.84 | +1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUIRX | GSRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.44 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.56 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.58 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.46 | +0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between GUIRX and GSRAX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GUIRX vs. GSRAX - Dividend Comparison
GUIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than GSRAX's 12.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class | 3.77% | 4.90% | 3.86% | 2.78% | 2.06% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.84% | 3.04% | 3.23% | 3.60% | 3.68% |
GSRAX Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund | 12.83% | 12.17% | 25.88% | 9.60% | 14.01% | 11.55% | 4.39% | 11.85% | 97.89% | 21.56% | 3.16% | 0.92% |
Drawdowns
GUIRX vs. GSRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUIRX drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum GSRAX drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUIRX and GSRAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUIRX | GSRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -44.40% | +30.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -12.84% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.16% | -25.43% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.21% | -38.97% | +24.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -9.35% | +7.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -6.10% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 2.87% | -1.63% |
Volatility
GUIRX vs. GSRAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) is 0.89%, while Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Growth Fund (GSRAX) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that GUIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GUIRX | GSRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 3.97% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.52% | 8.75% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56% | 17.30% | -12.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 20.22% | -16.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 19.85% | -15.92% |