PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUIRX vs. BSNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUIRX vs. BSNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUIRX achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly higher than BSNIX's 1.07% return.


GUIRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.57%
6M
2.09%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
2.77%

BSNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.49%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUIRX vs. BSNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
1.57%4.73%3.66%6.37%-9.66%3.11%3.86%1.41%
BSNIX
Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.07%4.90%3.17%6.78%-5.31%2.26%8.39%0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GUIRX and BSNIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019

0.79

The correlation between GUIRX and BSNIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUIRX vs. BSNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUIRX
GUIRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GUIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GUIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BSNIX
BSNIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BSNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BSNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUIRX vs. BSNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUIRXBSNIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.55

3.50

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.23

5.28

-1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.97

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.72

-0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.17

10.07

-0.89

GUIRX vs. BSNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUIRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the BSNIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUIRX and BSNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUIRXBSNIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

3.50

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.83

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.99

+0.11

Drawdowns

GUIRX vs. BSNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUIRX drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, which is greater than BSNIX's maximum drawdown of -9.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUIRX and BSNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUIRXBSNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-9.58%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-2.09%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.33%

-3.41%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.16%

-9.58%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.64%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-1.50%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.56%

+0.14%

Volatility

GUIRX vs. BSNIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) has a higher volatility of 0.90% compared to Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSNIX) at 0.55%. This indicates that GUIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUIRXBSNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

0.55%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.83%

1.29%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44%

1.63%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.70%

2.68%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

3.36%

+0.58%

GUIRX vs. BSNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUIRX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than BSNIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUIRX vs. BSNIX - Dividend Comparison

GUIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than BSNIX's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSNIX
Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
3.28%3.29%3.51%3.22%2.09%1.58%2.23%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
3.75%4.90%3.86%2.78%2.06%2.16%2.38%2.84%3.04%3.23%3.60%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUIRX and BSNIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUIRX has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to BSNIX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUIRX dropped -14.21% vs BSNIX's -9.58%.

BSNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUIRX and BSNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer