GUBGX vs. RSNRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory RS International Fund (GUBGX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX).
GUBGX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Feb 16, 1993. RSNRX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Nov 14, 1995.
Performance
GUBGX vs. RSNRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GUBGX vs. RSNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUBGX Victory RS International Fund | 0.71% | 27.06% | 5.35% | 19.85% | -15.87% | 14.07% | 5.55% | 21.71% | -10.61% | 25.26% |
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 16.87% | 69.60% | 15.94% | -8.64% | 35.02% | 83.01% | 27.35% | -24.49% | -45.81% | 1.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUBGX achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than RSNRX's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, GUBGX has underperformed RSNRX with an annualized return of 9.04%, while RSNRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.96% annualized return.
GUBGX
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -6.38%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 19.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
RSNRX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- 107.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 30.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUBGX vs. RSNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUBGX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is lower than RSNRX's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GUBGX vs. RSNRX — Risk / Return Rank
GUBGX
RSNRX
GUBGX vs. RSNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS International Fund (GUBGX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUBGX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 4.08 | -2.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 4.47 | -2.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.66 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 7.33 | -5.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 27.20 | -21.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUBGX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 4.08 | -2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.19 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.44 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.29 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GUBGX and RSNRX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GUBGX vs. RSNRX - Dividend Comparison
GUBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than RSNRX's 3.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUBGX Victory RS International Fund | 3.32% | 3.34% | 1.83% | 1.88% | 2.03% | 4.17% | 1.14% | 0.06% | 1.87% | 1.69% | 1.77% | 1.55% |
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 3.75% | 4.38% | 1.65% | 2.36% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GUBGX vs. RSNRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUBGX drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum RSNRX drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUBGX and RSNRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUBGX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -89.73% | +30.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -14.36% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -25.44% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.77% | -84.27% | +50.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.30% | -0.65% | -7.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -26.07% | +11.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 3.87% | -0.81% |
Volatility
GUBGX vs. RSNRX - Volatility Comparison
Victory RS International Fund (GUBGX) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) at 6.66%. This indicates that GUBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GUBGX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 6.66% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 19.24% | -7.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 26.79% | -9.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 25.47% | -9.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 31.80% | -15.16% |