GUBGX vs. SCHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Victory RS International Fund (GUBGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX).
GUBGX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Feb 16, 1993. SCHX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
GUBGX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GUBGX vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUBGX Victory RS International Fund | -2.42% | 27.06% | 5.35% | 19.85% | -15.87% | 14.07% | 5.55% | 21.71% | -10.61% | 25.26% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | -4.45% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUBGX achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's -4.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GUBGX has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.93% annualized return.
GUBGX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -11.02%
- YTD
- -2.42%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 16.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
SCHX
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUBGX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUBGX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GUBGX vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
GUBGX
SCHX
GUBGX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS International Fund (GUBGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUBGX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 0.96 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.46 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.49 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 6.98 | -2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUBGX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.96 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.65 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.77 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.80 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between GUBGX and SCHX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GUBGX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
GUBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than SCHX's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUBGX Victory RS International Fund | 3.43% | 3.34% | 1.83% | 1.88% | 2.03% | 4.17% | 1.14% | 0.06% | 1.87% | 1.69% | 1.77% | 1.55% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
GUBGX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUBGX drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUBGX and SCHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUBGX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -34.33% | -25.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -12.19% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -25.41% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.77% | -34.33% | +0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.16% | -6.40% | -4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -4.00% | -10.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.60% | +0.44% |
Volatility
GUBGX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Victory RS International Fund (GUBGX) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 5.31%. This indicates that GUBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GUBGX | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 5.31% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.27% | 9.64% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 18.33% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 17.14% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 18.13% | -1.52% |