PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTX vs. TBRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GTX vs. TBRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and TruBridge Inc (TBRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTX achieves a 79.86% return, which is significantly higher than TBRG's 18.89% return.


GTX

1D
0.45%
1M
-1.89%
6M
73.78%
YTD
79.86%
1Y
145.52%
3Y*
59.53%
5Y*
37.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.89%

TBRG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
35.61%
YTD
18.89%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
2.33%
5Y*
-3.79%
10Y*
-3.55%
ALL TIME*
4.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$74.68M$73.43M$92.59M

GTX vs. TBRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GTX
Garrett Motion Inc.
79.86%97.23%-6.62%26.90%-5.11%81.26%-55.66%-19.04%-43.91%
TBRG
TruBridge Inc
18.89%11.92%76.07%-58.85%-7.10%9.17%2.84%6.78%-5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GTX and TBRG is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2018

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GTX:

$5.81B

TBRG:

$393.58M

EPS

GTX:

$1.82

TBRG:

$0.30

PE Ratio

GTX:

17.09

TBRG:

87.27

PS Ratio

GTX:

1.63

TBRG:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

GTX:

$3.75B

TBRG:

$346.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GTX:

$881.00M

TBRG:

$183.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

GTX:

$482.00M

TBRG:

$57.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTX vs. TBRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTX
GTX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

TBRG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTX vs. TBRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and TruBridge Inc (TBRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTXTBRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.12

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.98

0.35

+6.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.97

1.00

+18.97

GTX vs. TBRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the TBRG Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTX and TBRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTX vs. TBRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTX drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, which is greater than TBRG's maximum drawdown of -86.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTX and TBRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTXTBRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.91%

-86.87%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.56%

-40.65%

+20.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.82%

-71.31%

+44.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-79.46%

+47.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.02%

-54.97%

+40.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.52%

-35.89%

-19.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.19%

14.38%

-7.19%

Volatility

GTX vs. TBRG - Volatility Comparison

Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) has a higher volatility of 13.44% compared to TruBridge Inc (TBRG) at 0.41%. This indicates that GTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTXTBRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.44%

0.41%

+13.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.03%

32.77%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.35%

41.28%

+8.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.63%

42.75%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.83%

41.99%

+21.84%

Dividends

GTX vs. TBRG - Dividend Comparison

GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while TBRG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTX
Garrett Motion Inc.
0.96%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TBRG
TruBridge Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.12%1.52%1.59%2.83%7.88%5.15%

Financials

GTX vs. TBRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garrett Motion Inc. and TruBridge Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

GTX vs. TBRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Garrett Motion Inc. and TruBridge Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

GTX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 976.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.7%.

TBRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TruBridge Inc reported a gross profit of 47.65M and revenue of 87.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.3%.

GTX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported an operating income of -2.00M and revenue of 976.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.2%.

TBRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TruBridge Inc reported an operating income of 4.98M and revenue of 87.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

GTX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Garrett Motion Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 976.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.

TBRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TruBridge Inc reported a net income of -4.29M and revenue of 87.79M, resulting in a net margin of -4.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GTX and TBRG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTX has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to TBRG (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTX dropped -93.91% vs TBRG's -86.87%.

GTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTX and TBRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer