GTX vs. TBRG
GTX (Garrett Motion Inc.) and TBRG (TruBridge Inc) are both stocks. GTX operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while TBRG operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, GTX returned 34.36%/yr vs -4.71%/yr for TBRG. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GTX vs. TBRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTX achieves a 99.14% return, which is significantly higher than TBRG's 18.31% return.
GTX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 99.14%
- 6M
- 96.22%
- 1Y
- 250.41%
- 3Y*
- 68.91%
- 5Y*
- 34.36%
- 10Y*
- —
TBRG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 18.31%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 16.56%
- 3Y*
- 1.80%
- 5Y*
- -4.71%
- 10Y*
- -2.72%
GTX vs. TBRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 99.14% | 97.23% | -6.62% | 26.90% | -5.11% | 81.26% | -55.66% | -19.04% | -43.91% |
TBRG TruBridge Inc | 18.31% | 11.92% | 76.07% | -58.85% | -7.10% | 9.17% | 2.84% | 6.78% | -5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTX and TBRG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2018 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
GTX:
$6.66B
TBRG:
$378.28M
GTX:
$1.72
TBRG:
$0.30
GTX:
20.06
TBRG:
86.92
GTX:
2.54
TBRG:
1.09
GTX:
$2.71B
TBRG:
$346.84M
GTX:
$855.00M
TBRG:
$183.86M
GTX:
$452.00M
TBRG:
$57.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTX vs. TBRG — Risk / Return Rank
GTX
TBRG
GTX vs. TBRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) and TruBridge Inc (TBRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTX | TBRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.85 | 1.12 | +0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.69 | 0.41 | +12.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.29 | 1.14 | +40.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTX vs. TBRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTX drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, which is greater than TBRG's maximum drawdown of -86.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTX and TBRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTX | TBRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.91% | -86.87% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.87% | -40.73% | +20.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.82% | -71.31% | +44.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.66% | -79.46% | +47.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -55.19% | +54.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.17% | -35.85% | -20.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 14.61% | -8.51% |
Volatility
GTX vs. TBRG - Volatility Comparison
Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) has a higher volatility of 12.34% compared to TruBridge Inc (TBRG) at 0.54%. This indicates that GTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTX | TBRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.34% | 0.54% | +11.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.34% | 33.92% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.06% | 41.83% | +6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.54% | 42.82% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.01% | 42.05% | +21.96% |
Dividends
GTX vs. TBRG - Dividend Comparison
GTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while TBRG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTX Garrett Motion Inc. | 0.87% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBRG TruBridge Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 1.52% | 1.59% | 2.83% | 7.88% | 5.15% |
Financials
GTX vs. TBRG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Garrett Motion Inc. and TruBridge Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GTX and TBRG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTX has higher volatility (12.34%) compared to TBRG (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTX dropped -93.91% vs TBRG's -86.87%.
GTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.26 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTX and TBRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer