PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTTTX vs. MMEYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTTTX vs. MMEYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTTTX achieves a 17.75% return, which is significantly lower than MMEYX's 28.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GTTTX has outperformed MMEYX with an annualized return of 14.25%, while MMEYX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.38% annualized return.


GTTTX

1D
-1.25%
1M
0.98%
YTD
17.75%
6M
16.68%
1Y
43.68%
3Y*
30.38%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
14.25%

MMEYX

1D
-1.76%
1M
2.36%
YTD
28.11%
6M
27.84%
1Y
52.83%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTTTX vs. MMEYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
17.75%12.83%45.27%17.37%-13.66%32.94%0.21%23.37%-10.83%7.34%
MMEYX
Victory Integrity Discovery Fund
28.11%14.25%11.36%14.83%-12.01%37.20%-1.34%21.60%-16.10%11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GTTTX and MMEYX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.96

The correlation between GTTTX and MMEYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTTTX vs. MMEYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTTTX
GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

MMEYX
MMEYX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MMEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MMEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTTTX vs. MMEYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTTTXMMEYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

6.41

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.70

19.69

-2.99

GTTTX vs. MMEYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the MMEYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTTTX and MMEYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTTTXMMEYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.70

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.47

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.49

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.50

-0.14

Drawdowns

GTTTX vs. MMEYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTTTX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, smaller than the maximum MMEYX drawdown of -69.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTTX and MMEYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTTTXMMEYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.58%

-69.05%

+12.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-8.19%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.29%

-25.23%

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.29%

-26.82%

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.29%

-54.35%

+7.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-1.76%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-15.57%

+5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.66%

-0.06%

Volatility

GTTTX vs. MMEYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) is 5.05%, while Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that GTTTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMEYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTTTXMMEYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

5.53%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

13.11%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

19.50%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.35%

22.39%

+12.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.81%

25.39%

+5.42%

GTTTX vs. MMEYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTTTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MMEYX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTTTX vs. MMEYX - Dividend Comparison

GTTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, less than MMEYX's 7.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
7.13%8.39%52.07%1.87%3.85%40.18%0.90%0.90%12.37%11.87%4.51%7.00%
MMEYX
Victory Integrity Discovery Fund
7.56%9.68%8.36%1.33%8.53%4.34%0.00%2.17%14.87%10.31%3.73%7.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GTTTX and MMEYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MMEYX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to GTTTX (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTTX dropped -56.58% vs MMEYX's -69.05%.

MMEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTTTX and MMEYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer