PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMEYX vs. NSVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMEYX vs. NSVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMEYX achieves a 35.19% return, which is significantly higher than NSVAX's 25.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MMEYX has outperformed NSVAX with an annualized return of 12.64%, while NSVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.92% annualized return.


MMEYX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.33%
6M
22.34%
YTD
35.19%
1Y
57.07%
3Y*
21.84%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
12.64%
ALL TIME*
12.07%

NSVAX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.83%
6M
16.67%
YTD
25.14%
1Y
40.56%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
10.92%
ALL TIME*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MMEYX vs. NSVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMEYX
Victory Integrity Discovery Fund
35.19%14.25%11.36%14.83%-12.01%37.20%-1.34%21.60%-16.10%11.07%
NSVAX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II
25.14%8.20%11.25%14.10%-13.70%34.27%10.11%20.65%-17.48%10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MMEYX and NSVAX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2002

0.94

The correlation between MMEYX and NSVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMEYX vs. NSVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MMEYX
MMEYX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MMEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MMEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

NSVAX
NSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
NSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MMEYX vs. NSVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMEYXNSVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.59

4.07

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.30

14.38

+6.92

MMEYX vs. NSVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMEYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the NSVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMEYX and NSVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMEYX vs. NSVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMEYX drawdown since its inception was -69.05%, which is greater than NSVAX's maximum drawdown of -59.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMEYX and NSVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMEYXNSVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.05%

-59.32%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.19%

-9.51%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-27.11%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-27.11%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.35%

-48.33%

-6.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-1.67%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.49%

-9.68%

-5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.69%

-0.16%

Volatility

MMEYX vs. NSVAX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Integrity Discovery Fund (MMEYX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX) at 3.69%. This indicates that MMEYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMEYXNSVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

3.69%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

11.71%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

16.90%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

22.19%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.37%

23.83%

+1.54%

MMEYX vs. NSVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMEYX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than NSVAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMEYX vs. NSVAX - Dividend Comparison

MMEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, less than NSVAX's 14.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMEYX
Victory Integrity Discovery Fund
7.16%9.68%8.36%1.33%8.53%4.34%0.00%2.17%14.87%10.31%3.73%7.64%
NSVAX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II
14.96%15.89%29.38%6.93%6.46%13.95%0.83%3.68%14.97%9.10%5.23%12.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MMEYX and NSVAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MMEYX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to NSVAX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMEYX dropped -69.05% vs NSVAX's -59.32%.

MMEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMEYX and NSVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer