PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTTTX vs. GCGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTTTX vs. GCGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTTTX achieves a 21.83% return, which is significantly higher than GCGIX's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GTTTX has underperformed GCGIX with an annualized return of 14.66%, while GCGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.74% annualized return.


GTTTX

1D
1.91%
1M
4.27%
YTD
21.83%
6M
18.83%
1Y
47.73%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
16.64%
10Y*
14.66%

GCGIX

1D
1.25%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
1.72%
6M
0.84%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
25.50%
5Y*
15.14%
10Y*
17.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTTTX vs. GCGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
21.83%12.83%45.27%17.37%-13.66%32.94%0.21%23.37%-10.83%7.34%
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
1.72%15.51%53.44%37.56%-29.62%29.10%32.21%29.70%-4.58%29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GTTTX and GCGIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between GTTTX and GCGIX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTTTX vs. GCGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTTTX
GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

GCGIX
GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTTTX vs. GCGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTTTXGCGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.21

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.21

1.09

+4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.33

3.50

+14.83

GTTTX vs. GCGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the GCGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTTTX and GCGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTTTX vs. GCGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTTTX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, smaller than the maximum GCGIX drawdown of -65.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTTX and GCGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTTTXGCGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.58%

-65.78%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-17.25%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.29%

-25.10%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.29%

-32.57%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.29%

-32.94%

-14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.49%

+4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.91%

-20.80%

+10.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

5.35%

-2.76%

Volatility

GTTTX vs. GCGIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) have volatilities of 5.76% and 5.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTTTXGCGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

5.67%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

12.76%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

16.31%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.35%

22.33%

+13.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.83%

21.60%

+9.23%

GTTTX vs. GCGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTTTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GCGIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTTTX vs. GCGIX - Dividend Comparison

GTTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, less than GCGIX's 7.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
7.37%7.50%23.16%7.08%19.27%42.43%9.71%4.02%10.10%4.76%0.76%0.87%
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
6.89%8.39%52.07%1.87%3.85%40.18%0.90%0.90%12.37%11.87%4.51%7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTTTX and GCGIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTTTX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to GCGIX (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTTX dropped -56.58% vs GCGIX's -65.78%.

GTTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTTTX and GCGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer