GTTTX vs. BOSVX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GTTTX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class) and BOSVX (Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GTTTX returned 15.07%/yr vs 12.04%/yr for BOSVX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GTTTX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BOSVX.

Performance

GTTTX vs. BOSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GTTTX having a 22.62% return and BOSVX slightly lower at 22.54%. Over the past 10 years, GTTTX has outperformed BOSVX with an annualized return of 15.07%, while BOSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.04% annualized return.

GTTTX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 22.62%
• 6M: 20.02%
• 1Y: 46.33%
• 3Y*: 32.66%
• 5Y*: 15.75%
• 10Y*: 15.07%

BOSVX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 22.54%
• 6M: 20.42%
• 1Y: 45.74%
• 3Y*: 20.06%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: 12.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTTTX vs. BOSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	22.62%	12.83%	45.27%	17.37%	-13.66%	32.94%	0.21%	23.37%	-10.83%	7.34%
BOSVX Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund	22.54%	9.78%	4.21%	18.18%	-4.27%	48.03%	0.83%	13.90%	-17.15%	5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GTTTX and BOSVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2011	0.96

The correlation between GTTTX and BOSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GTTTX vs. BOSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTTTX

GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 88
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

BOSVX

BOSVX Risk / Return Rank: 84
BOSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BOSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BOSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BOSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BOSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTTTX vs. BOSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTTTX	BOSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.26	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.16	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.40	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.95	5.40	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.43	15.77	+1.66

GTTTX vs. BOSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the BOSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTTTX and BOSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GTTTX vs. BOSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTTTX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, roughly equal to the maximum BOSVX drawdown of -57.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTTX and BOSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTTTX	BOSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.58%	-57.14%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-8.27%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.29%	-28.71%	-10.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.29%	-28.71%	-10.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.29%	-57.14%	+9.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.71%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.91%	-8.55%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.83%	-0.24%

Volatility

GTTTX vs. BOSVX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) at 4.79%. This indicates that GTTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTTTX	BOSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	4.79%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	13.56%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.62%	19.79%	-1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.34%	22.55%	+12.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.80%	25.02%	+5.78%

GTTTX vs. BOSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTTTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BOSVX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTTTX vs. BOSVX - Dividend Comparison

GTTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, less than BOSVX's 8.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOSVX Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund	8.15%	9.99%	9.71%	8.55%	21.96%	4.12%	1.21%	0.99%	10.36%	6.66%	0.89%	1.00%
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	6.84%	8.39%	52.07%	1.87%	3.85%	40.18%	0.90%	0.90%	12.37%	11.87%	4.51%	7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTTTX and BOSVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GTTTX and BOSVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GTTTX or BOSVX?

GTTTX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to BOSVX (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTTX dropped -56.58% vs BOSVX's -57.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.