PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOSVX vs. BRUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOSVX vs. BRUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOSVX achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than BRUSX's 10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, BOSVX has outperformed BRUSX with an annualized return of 11.45%, while BRUSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.


BOSVX

1D
1.12%
1M
1.97%
YTD
19.41%
6M
18.62%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
11.45%

BRUSX

1D
0.26%
1M
3.14%
YTD
10.33%
6M
10.83%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOSVX vs. BRUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOSVX
Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund
19.41%9.78%4.21%18.18%-4.27%48.03%0.83%13.90%-17.15%5.91%
BRUSX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund
10.33%7.13%17.57%18.14%-10.99%13.85%33.43%9.52%-15.77%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BOSVX and BRUSX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2011

0.85

The correlation between BOSVX and BRUSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOSVX vs. BRUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOSVX
BOSVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BOSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BOSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BRUSX
BRUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BRUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BRUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOSVX vs. BRUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOSVXBRUSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

1.45

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

2.04

+1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.55

2.42

+3.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.24

6.78

+9.46

BOSVX vs. BRUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOSVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the BRUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOSVX and BRUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOSVXBRUSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.45

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.11

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.40

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.51

-0.01

Drawdowns

BOSVX vs. BRUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOSVX drawdown since its inception was -57.14%, smaller than the maximum BRUSX drawdown of -60.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOSVX and BRUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOSVXBRUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.14%

-60.38%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.27%

-12.87%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.71%

-27.73%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.71%

-39.83%

+11.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.14%

-55.77%

-1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-13.55%

+4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

4.58%

-1.76%

Volatility

BOSVX vs. BRUSX - Volatility Comparison

Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund (BRUSX) have volatilities of 4.64% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOSVXBRUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.57%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

13.57%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.64%

21.43%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.62%

23.23%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.05%

23.35%

+1.70%

BOSVX vs. BRUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOSVX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BRUSX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOSVX vs. BRUSX - Dividend Comparison

BOSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, less than BRUSX's 9.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOSVX
Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund
8.36%9.99%9.71%8.55%21.96%4.12%1.21%0.99%10.36%6.66%0.89%1.00%
BRUSX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Fund
9.57%10.56%2.46%4.97%18.41%7.70%1.53%1.14%13.87%1.99%1.12%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOSVX and BRUSX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOSVX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to BRUSX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOSVX dropped -57.14% vs BRUSX's -60.38%.

BOSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOSVX and BRUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer