PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTT.PA vs. IAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GTT.PA vs. IAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS (GTT.PA) and International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A (IAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GTT.PA is traded in EUR, while IAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IAG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTT.PA achieves a 29.76% return, which is significantly higher than IAG.L's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GTT.PA has outperformed IAG.L with an annualized return of 27.42%, while IAG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.39% annualized return.


GTT.PA

1D
1.30%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
29.76%
6M
26.76%
1Y
28.59%
3Y*
34.05%
5Y*
27.83%
10Y*
27.42%

IAG.L

1D
6.98%
1M
14.42%
YTD
6.42%
6M
9.89%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
17.24%
10Y*
11.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTT.PA vs. IAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTT.PA
Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS
29.76%27.61%12.66%23.96%24.90%8.77%-2.16%32.38%40.52%30.23%
IAG.L
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A
6.42%33.56%106.55%27.81%-17.56%-5.04%-45.00%28.30%0.80%50.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GTT.PA and IAG.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2014

0.16

The correlation between GTT.PA and IAG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTT.PA vs. IAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTT.PA
GTT.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GTT.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTT.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTT.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GTT.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTT.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IAG.L
IAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTT.PA vs. IAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS (GTT.PA) and International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A (IAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTT.PAIAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.42

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.77

3.67

+1.10

GTT.PA vs. IAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTT.PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the IAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTT.PA and IAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTT.PA vs. IAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTT.PA drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum IAG.L drawdown of -79.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTT.PA and IAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTT.PAIAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-79.85%

+17.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.00%

-24.06%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.67%

-40.51%

+17.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.31%

-54.22%

+20.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.63%

-76.86%

+25.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-3.35%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.28%

-38.16%

+22.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.26%

9.31%

-3.05%

Volatility

GTT.PA vs. IAG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS (GTT.PA) is 6.95%, while International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A (IAG.L) has a volatility of 11.56%. This indicates that GTT.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTT.PAIAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

11.56%

-4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.85%

29.16%

-12.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.93%

37.10%

-13.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.21%

39.62%

-11.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.20%

49.77%

-18.57%

Dividends

GTT.PA vs. IAG.L - Dividend Comparison

GTT.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than IAG.L's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTT.PA
Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS
3.85%5.00%4.81%2.84%3.31%3.82%5.37%3.85%3.96%5.31%6.55%6.31%
IAG.L
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A
2.16%2.27%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.57%7.50%5.65%6.92%2.28%

Financials

GTT.PA vs. IAG.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS and International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GTT.PA and IAG.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTT.PA and IAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer