PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GTT.PA vs. COP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GTT.PA and COP is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

GTT.PA vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS (GTT.PA) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.47%
-10.75%
GTT.PA
COP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GTT.PA:

0.60

COP:

-0.35

Sortino Ratio

GTT.PA:

1.19

COP:

-0.34

Omega Ratio

GTT.PA:

1.14

COP:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

GTT.PA:

0.84

COP:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

GTT.PA:

1.67

COP:

-0.49

Ulcer Index

GTT.PA:

10.62%

COP:

16.34%

Daily Std Dev

GTT.PA:

30.34%

COP:

22.90%

Max Drawdown

GTT.PA:

-62.40%

COP:

-70.66%

Current Drawdown

GTT.PA:

0.00%

COP:

-24.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GTT.PA:

€5.82B

COP:

$124.62B

EPS

GTT.PA:

€7.76

COP:

$7.81

PE Ratio

GTT.PA:

19.99

COP:

12.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

GTT.PA:

€294.78M

COP:

$55.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GTT.PA:

€282.91M

COP:

$16.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

GTT.PA:

€178.17M

COP:

$24.38B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTT.PA achieves a 20.61% return, which is significantly higher than COP's -0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GTT.PA has outperformed COP with an annualized return of 16.29%, while COP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.23% annualized return.


GTT.PA

YTD

20.61%

1M

5.65%

6M

18.23%

1Y

28.69%

5Y*

15.34%

10Y*

16.29%

COP

YTD

-0.44%

1M

-4.20%

6M

-10.75%

1Y

-10.19%

5Y*

15.11%

10Y*

7.23%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GTT.PA vs. COP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTT.PA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GTT.PA is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GTT.PA is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GTT.PA is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GTT.PA is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GTT.PA is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GTT.PA is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

COP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COP is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COP is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COP is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COP is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COP is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COP is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GTT.PA vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS (GTT.PA) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GTT.PA, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.31-0.52
The chart of Sortino ratio for GTT.PA, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.74-0.60
The chart of Omega ratio for GTT.PA, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.090.93
The chart of Calmar ratio for GTT.PA, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.42-0.43
The chart of Martin ratio for GTT.PA, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.82-0.71
GTT.PA
COP

The current GTT.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the COP Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTT.PA and COP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.31
-0.52
GTT.PA
COP

Dividends

GTT.PA vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

GTT.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than COP's 3.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GTT.PA
Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS
3.98%4.81%2.84%3.31%3.82%5.37%3.85%3.96%5.31%6.55%6.31%7.23%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
3.19%3.15%3.37%4.20%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%4.11%

Drawdowns

GTT.PA vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTT.PA drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum COP drawdown of -70.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTT.PA and COP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-24.52%
GTT.PA
COP

Volatility

GTT.PA vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS (GTT.PA) has a higher volatility of 16.63% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 8.43%. This indicates that GTT.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
16.63%
8.43%
GTT.PA
COP

Financials

GTT.PA vs. COP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GTT.PA values in EUR, COP values in USD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab