PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTSGX vs. MAGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTSGX vs. MAGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTSGX achieves a -0.68% return, which is significantly lower than MAGSX's 9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GTSGX has outperformed MAGSX with an annualized return of 10.93%, while MAGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.76% annualized return.


GTSGX

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-0.68%
6M
-2.13%
1Y
0.62%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
10.93%

MAGSX

1D
-1.64%
1M
0.76%
YTD
9.73%
6M
8.67%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*
7.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTSGX vs. MAGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
-0.68%1.62%10.24%26.51%-13.60%26.31%9.45%33.53%-1.60%15.65%
MAGSX
Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund
9.73%12.48%6.46%12.32%-15.38%9.50%9.65%19.21%-6.59%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GTSGX and MAGSX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2006

0.89

The correlation between GTSGX and MAGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTSGX vs. MAGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTSGX
GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGSX
MAGSX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MAGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTSGX vs. MAGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) and Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTSGXMAGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.31

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

2.25

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

9.40

-9.01

GTSGX vs. MAGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the MAGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTSGX and MAGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTSGX vs. MAGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTSGX drawdown since its inception was -73.82%, which is greater than MAGSX's maximum drawdown of -56.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSGX and MAGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTSGXMAGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.82%

-56.06%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

-8.63%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

-15.35%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.94%

-21.13%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.25%

-23.20%

-15.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.55%

-1.86%

-4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.65%

-9.45%

-20.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

2.06%

+3.01%

Volatility

GTSGX vs. MAGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) is 4.06%, while Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund (MAGSX) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that GTSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTSGXMAGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

4.70%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

9.44%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

11.31%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

12.30%

+5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

13.08%

+4.98%

GTSGX vs. MAGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTSGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGSX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTSGX vs. MAGSX - Dividend Comparison

GTSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than MAGSX's 5.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTSGX
Madison Mid Cap Fund
3.39%3.37%5.76%1.25%1.96%4.38%3.43%3.74%7.57%3.58%4.34%6.09%
MAGSX
Madison Aggressive Allocation Fund
5.62%6.17%2.02%1.89%1.26%9.97%8.66%5.42%10.79%5.89%3.82%9.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTSGX and MAGSX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGSX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to GTSGX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTSGX dropped -73.82% vs MAGSX's -56.06%.

MAGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTSGX and MAGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer