GTRFX vs. LONGX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GTRFX (Gotham Total Return Fund) and LONGX (Longboard Alternative Growth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, GTRFX returned 9.30%/yr vs 24.95%/yr for LONGX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTRFX charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for LONGX.

Performance

GTRFX vs. LONGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTRFX achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly lower than LONGX's 12.82% return. Over the past 10 years, GTRFX has underperformed LONGX with an annualized return of 9.30%, while LONGX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.95% annualized return.

GTRFX

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: 5.25%
• 6M: 4.16%
• 1Y: 15.44%
• 3Y*: 16.09%
• 5Y*: 10.53%
• 10Y*: 9.30%

LONGX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 6M: 10.82%
• 1Y: 16.55%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 24.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTRFX vs. LONGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GTRFX Gotham Total Return Fund	5.25%	15.31%	15.73%	15.29%	-9.82%	27.83%	-11.41%	12.57%	-1.73%	18.93%
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund	12.82%	1.49%	14.95%	5.64%	-13.21%	13.89%	27.70%	13.82%	270.32%	19.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GTRFX and LONGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.61

The correlation between GTRFX and LONGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.84 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GTRFX vs. LONGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTRFX

GTRFX Risk / Return Rank: 45
GTRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GTRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
GTRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GTRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GTRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

LONGX

LONGX Risk / Return Rank: 40
LONGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LONGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
LONGX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
LONGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
LONGX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTRFX vs. LONGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTRFX	LONGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.56	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.33	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.28	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.39	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.04	9.18	+0.86

GTRFX vs. LONGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTRFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the LONGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTRFX and LONGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GTRFX vs. LONGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTRFX drawdown since its inception was -29.58%, smaller than the maximum LONGX drawdown of -77.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTRFX and LONGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTRFX	LONGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.58%	-77.16%	+47.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-7.09%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.48%	-14.57%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.51%	-19.28%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.58%	-77.16%	+47.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-0.06%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.27%	-7.34%	+3.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	1.84%	-0.21%

Volatility

GTRFX vs. LONGX - Volatility Comparison

Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTRFX	LONGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	3.22%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.52%	8.50%	-0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.98%	10.91%	-0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.54%	11.91%	+1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	137.79%	-123.93%

GTRFX vs. LONGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTRFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LONGX's 1.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTRFX vs. LONGX - Dividend Comparison

GTRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, while LONGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GTRFX Gotham Total Return Fund	9.06%	9.53%	11.50%	7.27%	10.25%	4.66%	0.71%	6.06%	1.48%	0.33%	0.05%
LONGX Longboard Alternative Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.40%	7.64%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	3.10%	268.50%	23.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTRFX and LONGX in my portfolio?

GTRFX and LONGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTRFX or LONGX?

GTRFX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to LONGX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTRFX dropped -29.58% vs LONGX's -77.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.