GTRFX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
GTRFX is managed by Gotham. It was launched on Mar 30, 2015. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
GTRFX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTRFX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTRFX Gotham Total Return Fund | -0.53% | 15.31% | 15.73% | 15.29% | -9.82% | 27.83% | -11.41% | 12.57% | -1.73% | 18.93% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTRFX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GTRFX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.10%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.
GTRFX
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 14.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.10%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTRFX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTRFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GTRFX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GTRFX
VOO
GTRFX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTRFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.53 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 1.55 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 7.31 | -1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTRFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.71 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.79 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.83 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTRFX and VOO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GTRFX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GTRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.58%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTRFX Gotham Total Return Fund | 9.58% | 9.53% | 11.50% | 7.27% | 10.25% | 4.66% | 0.71% | 6.06% | 1.48% | 0.33% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
GTRFX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTRFX drawdown since its inception was -29.58%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTRFX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTRFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.58% | -33.99% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -11.98% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.51% | -24.52% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.58% | -33.99% | +4.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -5.55% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -3.72% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.55% | -0.22% |
Volatility
GTRFX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gotham Total Return Fund (GTRFX) is 3.63%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that GTRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTRFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 5.34% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | 9.47% | -1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 18.11% | -3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 16.82% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 17.99% | -4.08% |