GTR vs. QDTE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GTR (WisdomTree Target Range Fund) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GTR returned 19.56% vs 39.17% for QDTE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.

Performance

GTR vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTR achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 16.06% return.

GTR

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 8.44%
• 6M: 8.61%
• 1Y: 19.56%
• 3Y*: 12.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDTE

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 7.12%
• YTD: 16.06%
• 6M: 15.73%
• 1Y: 39.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTR vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	8.44%	12.90%	5.90%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	16.06%	19.32%	16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GTR and QDTE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024	0.78

The correlation between GTR and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

GTR vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GTR	QDTE
Technology	27.5%	-
Financial Services	15.9%	5.4%
Industrials	12.1%	-
Healthcare	9.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	-
Communication Services	7.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Energy	4.2%	-
Basic Materials	3.7%	-
Utilities	2.7%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	-

Return for Risk

GTR vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTR

GTR Risk / Return Rank: 66
GTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GTR Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GTR Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 79
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTR vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTR	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	2.66	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	3.41	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.46	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	3.86	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.06	15.60	-2.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTR vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTR and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTR	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	2.66	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	1.29	-0.83

Drawdowns

GTR vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTR drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTR and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTR	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.44%	-22.86%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-10.20%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.60%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.63%	-3.14%	-5.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	2.52%	-1.02%

Volatility

GTR vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) is 2.36%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that GTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTR	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.36%	3.72%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.88%	11.01%	-4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.45%	14.81%	-5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.86%	18.42%	-7.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.86%	18.42%	-7.56%

GTR vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTR vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

GTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, less than QDTE's 43.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	5.30%	5.74%	5.30%	2.85%	0.46%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	43.41%	49.49%	32.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTR and QDTE in my portfolio?

GTR and QDTE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTR or QDTE?

QDTE has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to GTR (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTR dropped -21.44% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

Which ETF is better, GTR or QDTE?

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 39.17% vs 19.56% for GTR. On fees, GTR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, GTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTR or QDTE?

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 39.17% return vs 19.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTR or QDTE?

GTR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTR or QDTE?

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.41%, compared with 5.30% for GTR.

What is the main difference between GTR and QDTE?

GTR is categorized as Options Trading, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GTR and 0.97% for QDTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.