PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTR vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTR vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTR achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 9.87% return.


GTR

1D
0.28%
1M
2.20%
YTD
8.44%
6M
8.61%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
10Y*

DGRW

1D
0.71%
1M
4.18%
YTD
9.87%
6M
9.49%
1Y
21.83%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTR vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GTR
WisdomTree Target Range Fund
8.44%12.90%8.41%12.45%-19.07%3.77%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.87%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%9.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GTR and DGRW is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.86

The correlation between GTR and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

GTR vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GTR
DGRW

Technology

27.5%
32.1%

Financial Services

15.9%
11.3%

Industrials

12.1%
9.9%

Healthcare

9.8%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.1%

Communication Services

7.7%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
6.7%

Energy

4.2%
5.0%

Basic Materials

3.7%
3.3%

Utilities

2.7%
0.2%

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Technology

GTR
27.5%
DGRW
32.1%

Financial Services

GTR
15.9%
DGRW
11.3%

Industrials

GTR
12.1%
DGRW
9.9%

Healthcare

GTR
9.8%
DGRW
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GTR
9.3%
DGRW
7.1%

Communication Services

GTR
7.7%
DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

GTR
4.4%
DGRW
6.7%

Energy

GTR
4.2%
DGRW
5.0%

Basic Materials

GTR
3.7%
DGRW
3.3%

Utilities

GTR
2.7%
DGRW
0.2%

Real Estate

GTR
2.7%
DGRW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTR vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTR
GTR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTR vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTRDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

2.64

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

11.58

+1.48

GTR vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTR and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTRDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.22

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.86

-0.40

Drawdowns

GTR vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTR drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTR and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTRDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.44%

-32.04%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-8.30%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-16.21%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.12%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.63%

-3.01%

-5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.89%

-0.39%

Volatility

GTR vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) is 2.36%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that GTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTRDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

2.49%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.88%

7.67%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.45%

9.89%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.86%

13.97%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.86%

16.21%

-5.35%

GTR vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTR vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

GTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than DGRW's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
GTR
WisdomTree Target Range Fund
5.30%5.74%5.30%2.85%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTR and DGRW have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRW has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to GTR (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTR dropped -21.44% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 3-year performance, DGRW leads with 17.10% vs 12.84% for GTR. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, GTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 17.10% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GTR.

GTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 1.26% for DGRW.

GTR is categorized as Options Trading, while DGRW is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GTR and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTR and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer