PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTPE vs. GVIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTPE vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF (GTPE) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTPE achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly higher than GVIP's 16.92% return.


GTPE

1D
-0.33%
1M
7.59%
YTD
19.04%
6M
20.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GVIP

1D
0.65%
1M
5.70%
YTD
16.92%
6M
18.43%
1Y
37.39%
3Y*
30.87%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTPE vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GTPE and GVIP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTPE vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTPE

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTPE vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF (GTPE) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GTPE vs. GVIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTPEGVIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.29

0.82

+1.46

Drawdowns

GTPE vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTPE drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTPE and GVIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTPEGVIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-37.09%

+28.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-7.59%

+5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

Volatility

GTPE vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTPEGVIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

18.13%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

21.29%

-4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

21.64%

-4.47%

GTPE vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTPE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTPE vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

GTPE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GTPE
Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.29%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTPE and GVIP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GVIP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GVIP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GTPE.

GVIP has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for GTPE.

GTPE is categorized as Global Equities, while GVIP is Large Cap Growth Equities. GTPE tracks MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker Index, while GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GTPE and 0.45% for GVIP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTPE and GVIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer