GTOP vs. BPH
GTOP (Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTOP is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTOP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
GTOP vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GTOP
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 13.91%
- YTD
- 26.56%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BPH
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTOP vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GTOP Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF | 4.09% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTOP and BPH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTOP vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF (GTOP) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTOP | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.61 | 9.48 | -6.86 |
Drawdowns
GTOP vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTOP drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOP and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTOP | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -2.35% | -12.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | 0.00% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -1.08% | -2.31% |
Volatility
GTOP vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTOP | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.75% | 25.75% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 25.75% | -3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 25.75% | -3.00% |
GTOP vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTOP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTOP vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
Neither GTOP nor BPH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GTOP and BPH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GTOP.
GTOP and BPH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GTOP is categorized as Technology Equities, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GTOP and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for GTOP and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer