PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTOP vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTOP vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF (GTOP) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GTOP

1D
-1.04%
1M
13.91%
YTD
26.56%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
1.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTOP vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GTOP and BPH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTOP vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF (GTOP) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GTOP vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTOPBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.61

9.48

-6.86

Drawdowns

GTOP vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOP drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOP and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTOPBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-2.35%

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

0.00%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-1.08%

-2.31%

Volatility

GTOP vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTOPBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.75%

25.75%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.75%

25.75%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.75%

25.75%

-3.00%

GTOP vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTOP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTOP vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

Neither GTOP nor BPH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GTOP and BPH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GTOP.

GTOP and BPH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GTOP is categorized as Technology Equities, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GTOP and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTOP and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer