GTOH vs. RSP
GTOH (Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTOH is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Invesco, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. GTOH is actively managed, while RSP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTOH returned 7.86%/yr vs 15.23%/yr for RSP. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTOH charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
GTOH vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTOH achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return.
GTOH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 6.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
GTOH vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTOH Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF | 1.66% | 7.91% | 6.57% | 10.54% | -1.34% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTOH and RSP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022 | 0.63 |
The correlation between GTOH and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTOH vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
GTOH
RSP
GTOH vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTOH | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.30 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.49 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 9.48 | +5.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTOH | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.70 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.57 | +1.06 |
Drawdowns
GTOH vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTOH drawdown since its inception was -4.77%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOH and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTOH | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -59.92% | +55.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -7.85% | +5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.13% | -17.81% | +13.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.38% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -6.65% | +5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 2.06% | -1.59% |
Volatility
GTOH vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) is 0.82%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that GTOH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTOH | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 2.56% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.30% | 8.29% | -5.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99% | 11.56% | -8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 16.18% | -11.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 18.35% | -13.88% |
GTOH vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTOH has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTOH vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
GTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTOH Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF | 6.24% | 6.57% | 6.81% | 6.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTOH and RSP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSP has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to GTOH (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTOH dropped -4.77% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 3-year performance, RSP leads with 15.23% vs 7.86% for GTOH. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GTOH has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RSP has performed better with a 15.23% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for GTOH.
GTOH has the higher dividend yield at 6.24%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.
GTOH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while RSP is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for GTOH and 0.20% for RSP.
GTOH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTOH and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer